Cover Image

Induction of Labor: A Comparative Study of Intravaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for elective induction of labor in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix. Materials and Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted in Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur, Pakistan, from July 1,...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Aqueela Ayaz (Author)
Format:	Book
Published:	Elsevier, 2010-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:	article
Online Access:	Connect to this object online.
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Labor induction with randomized comparison of cervical, oral and intravaginal misoprostol
by: Masoumeh Dadashaliha, et al.
Published: (2021)

Eficácia de dinoprostone e misoprostol para indução do trabalho de parto em nulíparas Efficacy of dinoprostone and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women
by: Tenilson Amaral Oliveira, et al.
Published: (2011)

Sublingual misoprostol versus dinoprostone gel in labour induction
by: Juveria Jahangir, et al.
Published: (2020)

Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
by: O. Lapuente-Ocamica, et al.
Published: (2019)

Comparison of Misoprostol and Dinoprostone for elective induction of labour in nulliparous women at full term: A randomized prospective study
by: Stefos Theodoros, et al.
Published: (2004)

The role of dinoprostone for labor induction in postterm and high-risk term pregnancies
by: I.F. Urunsak, et al.
Published: (2020)

Dinoprostone vaginal insert vs the Foley catheter in labor induction. Observational study
by: Jakub Mlodawski, et al.
Published: (2021)

Using dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor: A single institute experience
by: Jen-Yu Tseng, et al.
Published: (2020)

The effect of propranolol plus misoprostol with misoprostol alone on induction of labor
by: Atieh Mohammadzadeh Vatanchi, et al.
Published: (2021)

Pilot Study of Labor Induction with Titrated oral Misoprostol
by: Shi-Yann Cheng, et al.
Published: (2006)

Predictive Factors for the Success of Vaginal Dinoprostone for the Induction of Labour
by: Liu W, et al.
Published: (2024)

TO COMPARE THE EFFECTS OF ORAL MISOPROSTOL ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH INTRACERVICAL FOLEY'S IN INDUCTION OF LABOR
by: Dania Junaid, et al.
Published: (2019)

Misoprostol bucal versus intravaginal para la maduración cervical
Published: (2002)

Intravaginal misoprostol versus sublingual misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy termination: a randomized controlled trial
by: Saipin Pongsatha, et al.
Published: (2021)

Misoprostol for term labor induction: A randomized controlled trial
by: Gulshan A. Saeed, et al.
Published: (2011)

Can the Induction of Labor with Misoprostol Increase Maternal Blood Loss?
by: Paulo César Praciano Souza, et al.
Published: (2017)

Pharmacokinetics of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for labor induction at term
by: Yana Vorontsova, et al.
Published: (2022)

A pilot study to compare propranolol and misoprostol versus misoprostol and placebo for induction of labor in primigravidae; a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
by: Ahmed Sherif Abdel Hamid, et al.
Published: (2023)

Complete Cervical Avulsion with Intravaginal Misoprostol for Second Trimester Pregnancy Termination
by: G. R. Sajjan, et al.
Published: (2012)

Effect of delayed misoprostol dosing interval for induction of labor: a retrospective study
by: Elizabeth H. Harman Crowell, et al.
Published: (2019)

Induction of Labor using Misoprostol in a Tertiary Hospital in the Southeast of Brazil
by: Tácito Augusto Godoy Silva, et al.
Published: (2017)

Misoprostol intravaginal administrado ambulatoriamente para inducción selectiva del trabajo de parto en pacientes con embarazo a término: Estudio de cohorte Vaginal misoprostol in pregnant low risk outpatients at term for selective induction of labor: Cohort study
by: Bernardo Moreno-Escallón
Published: (2012)

Caesarean sections and outcomes of labor induction after the introduction of a new intravaginal device: retrospective analysis
by: Veronika Anzeljc, et al.
Published: (2021)

Survey of Provider Preferences Regarding the Route of Misoprostol for Induction of Labor at Term
by: Rachel Towns, et al.
Published: (2017)

A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study
by: Kjersti Engen Marsdal, et al.
Published: (2018)

Comparing the effects of vaginal misoprostol, laminaria, and extra amniotic saline infusion on cervical ripening and induction of labor
by: Zohreh Tabasi, et al.
Published: (2020)

Misoprostol sublingual versus vaginal para indução do parto Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor
by: Francisco Edson de Lucena Feitosa
Published: (2006)

Misoprostol sublingual versus vaginal para indução do parto Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor
by: Francisco Edson de Lucena Feitosa
Published: (2006)

Pre-induction of labor with misoprostol. A useful option in antepartum cervical ripening
by: Yoan Hernández Cabrera, et al.
Published: (2017)

Intravaginal isonicotinic acid hydrazide (INH) versus misoprostol for cervical ripening prior to hysteroscopy
by: Ladan Haghighi, et al.
Published: (2020)

Oral versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labour Induction : A Comparative Study
by: Eke P Mahacakri, et al.
Published: (2018)

A novel misoprostol delivery system for induction of labor: clinical utility and patient considerations
by: Stephenson ML, et al.
Published: (2015)

Indução do Parto com Misoprostol: Comparação entre duas Doses Labor Induction with Misoprostol: Comparison of Two Dose Regimens
by: Dimas Augusto Carvalho de Araújo, et al.
Published: (1999)

Dinoprostone Gel versus Intra-cervical Foley's Catheter for Pre-induction Cervical Ripening: An audit
by: Dolly Chawla, et al.
Published: (2023)

Short stature and vaginal dinoprostone as independent predictors of composite maternal-newborn adverse outcomes in induction of labor after one previous cesarean: a retrospective cohort study
by: Sze Ping Tan, et al.
Published: (2024)

Maternal and perinatal outcomes in women with and without hypertensive syndromes submitted to induction of labor with misoprostol
by: Rossana Mariana Carvalho de Paiva Marques, et al.
Published: (2017)

Comentarios sobre el artículo "Misoprostol intravaginal administrado ambulatoriamente para inducción selectiva del trabajo de parto en pacientes con embarazo a término: Estudio de cohorte" Comments on "Vaginal misoprostol in pregnant low risk outpatients at term for selective induction of labor: Cohort Study"
by: Jeanette Montoya-Fernández, et al.
Published: (2012)

Individual and Combined Administration of Intravaginal Misoprostol and Transcervical Foley Catheter in Cervical Ripening in Nulliparous Women
by: Atousa Dabiri Oskei, et al.
Published: (2018)

Comparative Analytical Study of Dinoprostone Gel and Hyaluronidase Injection for Induction of Labour in Term Primigravida in Tertiary Rural Medical Centre of Western Uttar Pradesh
by: Neelam Swaroop, et al.
Published: (2022)

Comparison of Two Methods in Labor Induction in Nulliparous Women with Unfavorable Cervix at Term: Oxytocin Alone Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Slow-Release System (Propess®) + Oxytocin
by: Tunç Canda, et al.
Published: (2010)