Tibial Tubercle-Midepicondyle Distance Can Be a Better Index to Predict the Outcome of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Than Tibial Tubercle-Trochlear Groove Distance

Purpose: To compare the clinical utility of tibial tubercle-midepicondyle (TT-ME) and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distances in predicting the risk for recurrent instability after isolated MPFL reconstruction. Methods: A consecutive series of patients with recurrent patellar dislocation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tomoya Iseki, M.D (Author), Hiroshi Nakayama, M.D (Author), Takashi Daimon, Ph.D (Author), Shunichiro Kambara, M.D (Author), Ryo Kanto, M.D (Author), Motoi Yamaguchi, M.D (Author), Shintaro Onishi, M.D (Author), Toshiya Tachibana, M.D (Author), Shinichi Yoshiya, M.D (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2020-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose: To compare the clinical utility of tibial tubercle-midepicondyle (TT-ME) and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distances in predicting the risk for recurrent instability after isolated MPFL reconstruction. Methods: A consecutive series of patients with recurrent patellar dislocation who underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction made up the study population. The patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years. In assessment of surgical outcome, the patient was deemed to exhibit "postoperative recurrent patellar instability" when ≥1 of the following 3 conditions was identified: redislocation, positive apprehension sign, and positive J-sign (manifestation of abnormal patellar tracking). As for radiological parameters for position of the tibial tubercle, TT-ME distance (transverse distance between the tibial tubercle and midpoint of the transepicondylar line) and TT-TG distance were measured on axial computed tomography images. The clinical utility as a factor to predict the outcome of MPFL reconstruction was compared between the 2 distances using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. In addition, various radiological indices potentially influencing the surgical outcome were subjected to multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: We examined 38 knees in 38 patients with a mean age at surgery of 17.6 years. Postoperative recurrent patellar instability was encountered in 8 of the 38 knees. The ROC curve analysis showed the TT-ME distance to be a significantly better indicator in predicting surgical outcome than the TT-TG distance (P = .001). The univariate analysis for radiological factors demonstrated that the TT-ME distance was significantly associated with postoperative recurrent patellar instability (odds ratio 1.42, P = .012) whereas all other factors including the TT-TG distance did not correlate with recurrent instability. The multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that only the TT-ME distance was significantly associated with recurrent instability (P = .035). Conclusions: Analysis of our patient population undergoing isolated MPFL reconstruction showed that the TT-ME distance was a significantly better indicator than the TT-TG distance to predict the risk for recurrent instability after isolated MPFL reconstruction performed for patellar instability. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Item Description:2666-061X
10.1016/j.asmr.2020.04.014