The Intersections of COVID-19 Global Health Governance and Population Health Priorities: Equity-Related Lessons Learned From Canada and Selected G20 Countries

Background: COVID-19-related global health governance (GHG) processes and public health measures taken influenced population health priorities worldwide. We investigated the intersection between COVID-19-related GHG and how it redefined population health priorities in Canada and other G20 countries....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muriel Mac-Seing (Author), Erica Di Ruggiero (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2024-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_b0e4359b5f6e46feb3deb70ad69d26ce
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Muriel Mac-Seing  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Muriel Mac-Seing  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Erica Di Ruggiero  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Erica Di Ruggiero  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Erica Di Ruggiero  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The Intersections of COVID-19 Global Health Governance and Population Health Priorities: Equity-Related Lessons Learned From Canada and Selected G20 Countries 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2024-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2107-6952 
500 |a 10.3389/phrs.2024.1606052 
520 |a Background: COVID-19-related global health governance (GHG) processes and public health measures taken influenced population health priorities worldwide. We investigated the intersection between COVID-19-related GHG and how it redefined population health priorities in Canada and other G20 countries. We analysed a Canada-related multilevel qualitative study and a scoping review of selected G20 countries. Findings show the importance of linking equity considerations to funding and accountability when responding to COVID-19. Nationalism and limited coordination among governance actors contributed to fragmented COVID-19 public health responses. COVID-19-related consequences were not systematically negative, but when they were, they affected more population groups living and working in conditions of vulnerability and marginalisation.Policy options and recommendations: Six policy options are proposed addressing upstream determinants of health, such as providing sufficient funding for equitable and accountable global and public health outcomes and implementing gender-focused policies to reduce COVID-19 response-related inequities and negative consequences downstream. Specific programmatic (e.g., assessing the needs of the community early) and research recommendations are also suggested to redress identified gaps.Conclusion: Despite the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, programmatic and research opportunities along with concrete policy options must be mobilised and implemented without further delay. We collectively share the duty to act upon global health justice. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a COVID-19 
690 |a equity 
690 |a global health governance 
690 |a population health priorities 
690 |a Canada and G20 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Public Health Reviews, Vol 45 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://www.ssph-journal.org/articles/10.3389/phrs.2024.1606052/full 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2107-6952 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/b0e4359b5f6e46feb3deb70ad69d26ce  |z Connect to this object online.