Revisiting the question of pemphigus classification

Analysis of various classifications of pemphigus shows that there are no fundamental differences between them. The main distinctions consist in use of diverse terms in naming of some forms of pemphigus and in inclusion or exclusion of certain subtypes from the classifications. Authors propose to use...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexey V. Samtsov (Author), Evgeny V. Sokolovskiy (Author), Natalia P. Teplyuk (Author), Irena E. Belousova (Author), Muza M. Kokhan (Author), Elena V. Matushevskaya (Author)
Format: Book
Published: State Scientific Center of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology, 2021-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Analysis of various classifications of pemphigus shows that there are no fundamental differences between them. The main distinctions consist in use of diverse terms in naming of some forms of pemphigus and in inclusion or exclusion of certain subtypes from the classifications. Authors propose to use the following classification in the dermatological clinical practice, for educational and scientific purposes and for clinical guidelines: 1) pemphigus vulgaris (1.1. Pemphigu s vegetans); 2) pemphigus foliaceus (2.1. Pemphigus endemic (Fogo selvagem), 2.2. Pemphigus erythematosus (Senear Usher)); 3) herpetiform pemphigus; 4) paraneoplastic pemphigus; 5) IgA pemphigus (5.1. Subcorneal pustular dermatosis, 5.2. Intraepidermal neutrophilic dermatosis).
Item Description:0042-4609
2313-6294
10.25208/vdv1216