Tick bites in different professions and regions: pooled cross-sectional study in the focus area Bavaria, Germany

Abstract Background As the vector-borne diseases tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) and Lyme borreliosis (LB) are common in Germany and transmitted by tick bites, the aim of this study was to assess differences in the number of tick bites in various professions and regions across southern Germany to eval...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Louisa Schielein (Author), Linda Tizek (Author), Tilo Biedermann (Author), Alexander Zink (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2022-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_b31e1d9a0e3b48f7ad21c2b8abdea48e
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Louisa Schielein  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Linda Tizek  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Tilo Biedermann  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Alexander Zink  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Tick bites in different professions and regions: pooled cross-sectional study in the focus area Bavaria, Germany 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2022-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12889-021-12456-3 
500 |a 1471-2458 
520 |a Abstract Background As the vector-borne diseases tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) and Lyme borreliosis (LB) are common in Germany and transmitted by tick bites, the aim of this study was to assess differences in the number of tick bites in various professions and regions across southern Germany to evaluate the differences in tick-associated risk. Materials and methods The analysis is based on three cross-sectional studies that were conducted in 2016 and 2017 in two real-life settings and in one medical setting in Bavaria. All participants filled in a paper-based questionnaire about their history with tick bites. Only adult participants (≥ 18 years) were included in this study. Results Overall, 3503 individuals (mean age 50.8 ± 15.2 years, median age 53.0 ± 12.2 years, 54.0% female) were included. Of these, 50% worked in an outdoor profession and 56% lived in environs. Around 70% of participants reported at least one previous tick bite. In comparison to indoor workers, forestry workers (OR = 2.50; 95% CI: 1.10-5.68) had the highest risk for a tick bite followed by farmers (OR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.01-1.47). Furthermore, people living in rural areas (OR = 1.97, 95% CI:1.49-2.59) and environs (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.54-2.55) were twice as likely to have a previous tick bite than people living in urban areas. In general, slightly more tick bites were reported by people living in eastern Bavaria. Conclusion Rising numbers of TBE and LB indicate the need for further prevention strategies, which should focus on outdoor professions with a higher risk and people living in environs and rural areas. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Tick bite 
690 |a Prevalence 
690 |a Profession 
690 |a Region 
690 |a Bavaria 
690 |a Tick-associated risk 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Public Health, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12456-3 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2458 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/b31e1d9a0e3b48f7ad21c2b8abdea48e  |z Connect to this object online.