Judicial decisions regarding cancer appeals: an analysis of arguments of the Law as applied to health

The implications of developing cancer demand that affected individuals and their families seek professional care, which are not always offered in a manner adequate to their needs. This leads them to appeal to court instances in order to guarantee their right to health. The goal of the present study...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robson Nogueira Costa Santos (Author), Roseney Bellato (Author), Laura Filomena Santos de Araújo (Author), Karla Beatriz Barros de Almeida (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Universidade Federal de Goias, 2014-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_b350fbdf2a3b42c69534de902179a0c4
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Robson Nogueira Costa Santos  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Roseney Bellato  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Laura Filomena Santos de Araújo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Karla Beatriz Barros de Almeida  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Judicial decisions regarding cancer appeals: an analysis of arguments of the Law as applied to health 
260 |b Universidade Federal de Goias,   |c 2014-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1518-1944 
500 |a 10.5216/ree.v16i2.24577 
520 |a The implications of developing cancer demand that affected individuals and their families seek professional care, which are not always offered in a manner adequate to their needs. This leads them to appeal to court instances in order to guarantee their right to health. The goal of the present study is to analyze legal struggles in relation to the health of people with cancer. It is a qualitative documentary study analyzing 34 court rulings relative to the period of May 2008 to April 2009, made by the Mato Grosso Court of Justice (TJMT). Out of these, 88.2% were requests for medication, 11.7% for nutritional supplies, 2.9% for land transportation and 2.9% for neurosurgery. Throughout the analysis, we realized that the arguments used by the State were insufficient before those presented by the magistrate used to reaffirm the right to life as guaranteed by the constitution, which takes precedence over interests of the State. doi: 10.5216/ree.v16i2.24577. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a ES 
546 |a PT 
690 |a Direito à Saúde 
690 |a Enfermagem 
690 |a Decisões Judiciais 
690 |a Neoplasias 
690 |a Nursing 
690 |a RT1-120 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem, Vol 16, Iss 2, Pp 394-400 (2014) 
787 0 |n http://revistas.ufg.emnuvens.com.br/fen/article/view/24577 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1518-1944 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/b350fbdf2a3b42c69534de902179a0c4  |z Connect to this object online.