Toward systematic integration between self-determination theory and motivational interviewing as examples of top-down and bottom-up intervention development: autonomy or volition as a fundamental theoretical principle
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Clinical interventions can be developed through two distinct pathways. In the first, which we call top-down, a well-articulated theory drives the development of the intervention, whereas in the case of a bottom-up approach, clinical experience, more so than a ded...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Vansteenkiste Maarten (Author), Williams Geoffrey C (Author), Resnicow Ken (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
BMC,
2012-03-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Strategy in talent systems: Top-down and bottom-up approaches
by: Jamie Taylor, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Dementia care in Israel: top down and bottom up processes
by: Netta Bentur, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Chapter 5 Linguistic areas, bottom-up or top-down? The case of the Guaporé-Mamoré
by: Muysken, Pieter
Published: (2014) -
Motivational Interviewing: moving from why to how with autonomy support
by: Resnicow Ken, et al.
Published: (2012) -
A Matter of Bottom-Up or Top-Down Processes: The Role of Attention in Multisensory Integration
by: Jess Hartcher-O'Brien
Published: (2017)