A comparison of the rate of retraction with low-level laser therapy and conventional retraction technique
Background and Objectives: A major concern of orthodontic patients is treatment time. Reducing the treatment time requires increasing the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Research has proved that bone resorption is the rate-limiting step in tooth movement. Therefore, any procedure that potentiate...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Saran Arumughan (Author), Sanju Somaiah (Author), Sunil Muddaiah (Author), Balakrishna Shetty (Author), Goutham Reddy (Author), S Roopa (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
A comparative evaluation of interleukin 1 beta and prostaglandin E2 with and without low-level laser therapy during En masse retraction
by: Jeffy Ann Jose, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Cephalometric evaluation of patients treated by maxillary anterior segmental distraction
by: Shanahaz Kuzhippayi Saidalavi, et al.
Published: (2018) -
An evaluation of dentofacial changes in Angle's class II division 1 patients using AdvanSync 2
by: Sanshavi Ponnamma, et al.
Published: (2023) -
An adjunctive minor surgical procedure for increased rate of retraction
by: Prabhakar Krishnan, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Comparison of rate of canine retraction and anchorage potential between mini-implant and conventional molar anchorage: An In vivo study
by: D Davis, et al.
Published: (2018)