Evidence-based assessment of the efficacy and effectiveness of light/laser activation in in-office dental bleaching

Many in-office bleaching techniques use the light/laser in conjunction with the bleaching agent claiming more favorable bleaching results. Controversy still exists in the literature as to the role of a light/laser in bleaching results. The goal of this study is to determine, through Comparative Effe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reem A Ajaj (Author), Francesco Chiappelli (Author), Linda Phi (Author), Amy Giroux (Author), Carl Maida (Author), Neal Garrett (Author), Olga Polinovsky (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_b4b03c2076e8408cb6c886de4e6ee418
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Reem A Ajaj  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Francesco Chiappelli  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Linda Phi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Amy Giroux  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Carl Maida  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Neal Garrett  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Olga Polinovsky  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Evidence-based assessment of the efficacy and effectiveness of light/laser activation in in-office dental bleaching 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2155-8213 
500 |a 10.4103/2155-8213.100388 
520 |a Many in-office bleaching techniques use the light/laser in conjunction with the bleaching agent claiming more favorable bleaching results. Controversy still exists in the literature as to the role of a light/laser in bleaching results. The goal of this study is to determine, through Comparative Effectiveness-Efficacy Research and Analysis for Practice (CEERAP), if the co-use of light/laser activation with the chemical bleaching agent has improved teeth whitening compared to using the chemical bleaching agent alone. Systematic reviews and randomized clinical trials on the research question were obtained using multiple search engines. Assessment of the level and quality of evidence and acceptable sample analysis were performed for the Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs). Due to heterogeneity of the acceptable studies, meta-analysis was performed only on the two most homogenous studies. Qualitative assessment of the acceptable studies was performed. The strength of clinical recommendation was assessed. Only one qualitative systematic review was found. Eight articles were accepted as high quality RCTs. The meta-analysis shows preferable outcome when using the light activation with the bleaching material than when using the bleaching material alone. Qualitative assessment of the acceptable studies shows conflicting results. Most studies agreed that the use of light is proven to increase the whitening effect of the bleaching agent, especially for a short term after treatment. Additional studies with greater consistency in methodology and outcomes are needed to be able to reach a definite consensus regarding the effectiveness of using light during bleaching through an overarching meta-analysis for more powerful statistical results. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Evidence-based dentistry 
690 |a in-office bleaching 
690 |a light activated bleaching 
690 |a meta-analysis 
690 |a teeth whitening 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Dental Hypotheses, Vol 3, Iss 2, Pp 55-66 (2012) 
787 0 |n http://www.dentalhypotheses.com/article.asp?issn=2155-8213;year=2012;volume=3;issue=2;spage=55;epage=66;aulast=Ajaj 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2155-8213 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/b4b03c2076e8408cb6c886de4e6ee418  |z Connect to this object online.