Virtual education during COVID-19 in higher education: A systematic review

The objective of the present systematic review aimed to analyze studies linked to online teaching-learning, digital competence tutoring, and technological tools in virtual education during COVID-19 in higher education. The suggested methodology by the PRISMA declaration was pursued; the information...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fatima del Socorro Torres-Caceres (Author), Juan Méndez-Vergaray (Author), Edith Gissela Rivera-Arellano (Author), Mildred Jénica Ledesma-Cuadros (Author), Yolanda Josefina Huayta-Franco (Author), Edward Flores (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Universidad de Deusto, 2022-05-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_b5b15eb72f5b402c95b8f1fba4662e29
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Fatima del Socorro Torres-Caceres  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Juan Méndez-Vergaray  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Edith Gissela Rivera-Arellano  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mildred Jénica Ledesma-Cuadros  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yolanda Josefina Huayta-Franco  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Edward Flores  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Virtual education during COVID-19 in higher education: A systematic review 
260 |b Universidad de Deusto,   |c 2022-05-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.18543/tjhe.2217 
500 |a 2340-8170 
500 |a 2386-3137 
520 |a The objective of the present systematic review aimed to analyze studies linked to online teaching-learning, digital competence tutoring, and technological tools in virtual education during COVID-19 in higher education. The suggested methodology by the PRISMA declaration was pursued; the information search was conducted in Scopus, EBSCO, Springer Open, ProQuest, and One File. The target period ranged from May 10, 2021, to July 4, 2021; the identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion for its progress were performed. The search produced a total of 230 studies, with 45 remaining. The inclusion criteria included original peer-reviewed research articles and qualitative and quantitative studies in higher education, comprising teachers and students addressing the study objective. In contrast, the exclusion criteria covered bibliographic reviews with procedural deficiencies, studies not exposed to a peer review process, and those not depicting a relationship with parts of the study. The results reveal that online teaching-learning, digital competence tutoring, and technological tools have been affirmative features expected to persist in higher virtual education engendered by the COVID-19 pandemic. Received: 5 October 2021 Accepted: 22 April 2022 
546 |a EN 
690 |a online learning 
690 |a distance learning 
690 |a distance education 
690 |a teaching digital competence 
690 |a technological tools 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Tuning Journal for Higher Education, Vol 9, Iss 2 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://tuningjournal.org/article/view/2217 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2340-8170 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2386-3137 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/b5b15eb72f5b402c95b8f1fba4662e29  |z Connect to this object online.