A survey of retention practices and protocols followed among orthodontists in India

Background: There are different types of retention protocols and retainers prescribed by the orthodontists across the globe. Aim: The study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the retention practices followed by the orthodontists in India. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire link with a set...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S R Radha (Author), Gowri Sankar Singaraju (Author), Prasad Mandava (Author), Vivek Reddy Ganugapanta (Author), Hema Bapireddy (Author), Lakshmi Narayana Pilli (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_b5c1937ed3f94f53aedfeb3886df5e9d
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a S R Radha  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Gowri Sankar Singaraju  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Prasad Mandava  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Vivek Reddy Ganugapanta  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hema Bapireddy  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lakshmi Narayana Pilli  |e author 
245 0 0 |a A survey of retention practices and protocols followed among orthodontists in India 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0975-7406 
500 |a 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_615_20 
520 |a Background: There are different types of retention protocols and retainers prescribed by the orthodontists across the globe. Aim: The study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the retention practices followed by the orthodontists in India. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire link with a set of 29 questions was generated using the Google Forms App. The questions related to the basic demographic details followed by retention procedures in maxilla and mandible as related to the type of retainer, duration of wear, retention check-ups, and adjunctive procedures being followed. The Google forms were mailed to 1147 registered life members of the Indian Orthodontic Society. Results: The overall response rate was 20.1%. On receiving of the completed questionnaires, the data were statistically analyzed. Dual mode of retention, fixed retainers with removable thermoplastic resin (TR)/vacuum formed retainers (VFR) (24%) were the common type of retention in maxilla whereas the fixed bonded retainer (44.5%) was more commonly used in mandible. Full time wear of maxillary retainer was recommended by 85.2% of the respondents. The recommended duration of the fixed retainer is for 2-5 years (41.9%). Conclusion: A trend towards more dual retention instead of solitary removable or solitary fixed retention, more VFR instead of Hawley-type retainers has been demonstrated in the survey. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a bonded retainer 
690 |a hawley 
690 |a orthodontist 
690 |a retention 
690 |a thermoplastic 
690 |a vacuum formed 
690 |a Pharmacy and materia medica 
690 |a RS1-441 
690 |a Analytical chemistry 
690 |a QD71-142 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 5, Pp 149-156 (2021) 
787 0 |n http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=5;spage=149;epage=156;aulast=Radha 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0975-7406 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/b5c1937ed3f94f53aedfeb3886df5e9d  |z Connect to this object online.