COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF AMIODARONE AND BISOPROLOL IN TREATMENT OF VENTRICULAR PREMATURE BEATS IN PATIENTS WITH METABOLIC SYNDROME

<p><strong>Aim.</strong> Comparative study of amiodarone and bisoprolol efficacy in patients with ventricular arrhythmia and metabolic syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods.</strong> 146 patients with the AHA/NHLBI 2005 metabolic syndrome and symptomatic ventricul...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: V. M. Provotorov (Autore), M. L. Gluhovsky (Autore)
Natura: Libro
Pubblicazione: Столичная издательская компания, 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Soggetti:
Accesso online:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_b60f37e4c37d4fe4a02c4f2bd6cfa411
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a V. M. Provotorov  |e author 
700 1 0 |a M. L. Gluhovsky  |e author 
245 0 0 |a COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF AMIODARONE AND BISOPROLOL IN TREATMENT OF VENTRICULAR PREMATURE BEATS IN PATIENTS WITH METABOLIC SYNDROME 
260 |b Столичная издательская компания,   |c 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1819-6446 
500 |a 2225-3653 
500 |a 10.1234/1819-6446-2009-6-29-34 
520 |a <p><strong>Aim.</strong> Comparative study of amiodarone and bisoprolol efficacy in patients with ventricular arrhythmia and metabolic syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods.</strong> 146 patients with the AHA/NHLBI 2005 metabolic syndrome and symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia were included in the study. 52 patients received regular oral amiodarone (200 mg daily, 5 days a week) therapy, 55 patients received bisoprolol (10 mg daily) treatment and 39 patients did not receive any antiarrhythmic therapy (control group). Treatment efficacy was evaluated by Holter monitoring (before start and after 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 months of therapy).</p><p><strong>Results.</strong> Significant efficacy advantage of bisoprolol vs this of amiodarone was observed in 12 months of therapy (50.0% of effectively treated patients vs 17.3%, p=0.02). Significant difference in a number of patients ceased therapy because of antiarrhythmic effect loss was also revealed (20.0% vs 46.1%, p=0.004). A number of patients stopped therapy because of side effects was comparable in the both groups. Patient age younger than 42 years old in combination with a number of ventricular premature beats morphology less than 4 allowed predicting effective antiarrhythmic treatment for both drugs with sensitivity of 70.3% and specificity of 65.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion.</strong> Bisoprolol have an advantage (versus amiodarone) within 9-12 month therapy in patients with ventricular premature beats and metabolic syndrome. Drug refractoriness and side effects monitoring is necessary.</p> 
546 |a EN 
546 |a RU 
690 |a метаболический синдром 
690 |a амиодарон 
690 |a бисопролол 
690 |a желудочковая экстрасистолия 
690 |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology 
690 |a RM1-950 
690 |a Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system 
690 |a RC666-701 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии, Vol 5, Iss 6, Pp 29-34 (2016) 
787 0 |n http://www.rpcardio.ru/jour/article/view/732 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1819-6446 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2225-3653 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/b60f37e4c37d4fe4a02c4f2bd6cfa411  |z Connect to this object online.