In vitro comparison of the physical and mechanical properties of an ormocer with an ormocer‐based composite and a nanocomposite restorative material
Abstract Objectives To compare an ormocer with a first generation ormocer‐based composite and a nanocomposite in terms of surface roughness, surface hardness, and microleakage. Materials and Methods An ormocer (Admira Fusion), a first generation ormocer‐based composite (Admira) and a nanocomposite (...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Karien Jansen van Rensburg (Author), Dorette Kritzinger (Author), Samantha Arnold (Author), Glynn D. Buchanan (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Wiley,
2023-10-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Restoration of posterior teeth with indirect and direct solutions, using ORMOCER and nanohybrid composite technology
by: Roland Róbert Daubner, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Ormocer: An aesthetic direct restorative material; An in vitro study comparing the marginal sealing ability of organically modified ceramics and a hybrid composite using an ormocer-based bonding agent and a conventional fifth-generation bonding agent
by: Sarika Kalra, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Evaluation of fracture resistance and mode of failure of premolars restored with nanohybrid composite, ORMOCER and ceramic inlays
by: Mohit. K. Gunwal, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Bioactive, Ormocer, and Conventional GIC Restorative Materials in Primary Molars: An In Vitro Study Microleakage of Three Restorative Materials
by: Khushboo Jain, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Color stability and surface roughness of ormocer- versus methacrylate-based single shade composite in anterior restoration
by: Maha M. Ebaya, et al.
Published: (2022)