Comparative prospective study of Hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy in infertile women
Aim: To compare the findings and diagnostic accuracy of Hysterosalpingography (HSG) and hysteroscopy in infertile women. Setting and Design: Prospective comparative study in a tertiary care Centre. Material and Methods: 108 women with primary or secondary infertility were recruited. In all women aft...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_b6981c40073e42b0ab6582261e3b51f7 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Leena Wadhwa |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Pooja Rani |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Pushpa Bhatia |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Comparative prospective study of Hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy in infertile women |
260 | |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, |c 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 0974-1208 | ||
500 | |a 1998-4766 | ||
500 | |a 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_123_16 | ||
520 | |a Aim: To compare the findings and diagnostic accuracy of Hysterosalpingography (HSG) and hysteroscopy in infertile women. Setting and Design: Prospective comparative study in a tertiary care Centre. Material and Methods: 108 women with primary or secondary infertility were recruited. In all women after basic infertility workup, both HSG and hysteroscopy were performed. Results: Out of 108 women, in 3 women HSG couldn't be done and in one woman there was uterine perforation on hysteroscopy. HSG showed normal uterine cavity in 77.8% (81/105) women and abnormal in 22.85% (24/105). Hysteroscopy findings were normal in 70.09% (75/107) and abnormal in 29.91% (32/107). Hysteroscopy detected incidental findings in 15.38% (16/104) cases. HSG showed irregular uterine cavity in 14.15% (15/105) women but on hysteroscopy; normal cavity was present in 6 (40%) women and abnormality was detected in 9 (60%) women. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive value of HSG in evaluating uterine cavity abnormalities were 44.83% (95% confidence interval (CI); 0.26-0.64), 86.67% (95% CI; 0.76-0.93), 56.52% (95% CI; 0.34-0.76) and 80.25% (95%CI; 0.69-0.88). Positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio of HSG in detecting uterine cavity abnormality was 3.36 and 0.64 respectively. The agreement between HSG and hysteroscopy was 75%. This was statistically significant (P value = 0.001) with fair strength of agreement between HSG and hysteroscopy. (k value= 0.336). Conclusion: Hysteroscopy should be performed in all infertile patients as it can detect significant number of incidental findings missed by HSG. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a Hysterosalpingography | ||
690 | |a hysteroscopy | ||
690 | |a infertility | ||
690 | |a Gynecology and obstetrics | ||
690 | |a RG1-991 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, Vol 10, Iss 2, Pp 73-78 (2017) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2017;volume=10;issue=2;spage=73;epage=78;aulast=Wadhwa | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/0974-1208 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/1998-4766 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/b6981c40073e42b0ab6582261e3b51f7 |z Connect to this object online. |