What would primary care practitioners do differently after a delayed cancer diagnosis? Learning lessons from their experiences
AbstractObjective Diagnosis of cancer is challenging in primary care due to the low incidence of cancer cases in primary care practice. A prolonged diagnostic interval may be due to doctor, patient or system factors, or may be due to the characteristics of the cancer itself. The objective of this st...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Tuomas H. Koskela (Author), Magdalena Esteva (Author), Marcello Mangione (Author), Sara Contreras Martos (Author), Senada Hajdarevic (Author), Cecilia Högberg (Author), Mercè Marzo-Castillejo (Author), Jolanta Sawicka-Powierza (Author), Vija Siliņa (Author), Michael Harris (Author), Davorina Petek (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group,
2024-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
How the probability of presentation to a primary care clinician correlates with cancer survival rates: a European survey using vignettes
by: Michael Harris, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Pluralistic task shifting for a more timely cancer diagnosis. A grounded theory study from a primary care perspective
by: Hans Thulesius, et al.
Published: (2021) -
The use of digital tools by general practitioners in Finnish public health centres
by: Kaisa Kujansivu, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Medicina basada en la evidencia - Síntesis de la evidencia
by: Viana Zulaica, Cristina, et al.
Published: (2006) -
Experiencing improved assessment and control of pain in end‐of‐life care when using the Abbey Pain Scale systematically
by: Carola Ludvigsson, et al.
Published: (2020)