Mechanical Properties of Different Aesthetic Archwires

Objectives:In response to patient demands for better aesthetics in orthodontics, manufacturers have developed different aesthetic wires and brackets. The aim of this study were to evaluate the mechanical properties of archwires. Thus, color properties and surface roughness of the different aesthetic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mehmet Akın (Author), Zehra İleri (Author), Sertaç Aksakallı (Author), Faruk Ayhan Başçiftçi (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Galenos Yayinevi, 2014-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_b7f5846c0e314b7ba10c9931da4d9cb5
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Mehmet Akın  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Zehra İleri  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sertaç Aksakallı  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Faruk Ayhan Başçiftçi  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Mechanical Properties of Different Aesthetic Archwires 
260 |b Galenos Yayinevi,   |c 2014-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2528-9659 
500 |a 2148-9505 
500 |a 10.13076/TJO-D-14-00006 
520 |a Objectives:In response to patient demands for better aesthetics in orthodontics, manufacturers have developed different aesthetic wires and brackets. The aim of this study were to evaluate the mechanical properties of archwires. Thus, color properties and surface roughness of the different aesthetic archwires were analyzed.Materials and Method:Seven brands of aesthetic archwires were evaluated for color and roughness measurements. The color measurement of each sample was performed using a spectrophotometer. A profilometer was used to measure surface roughness. For roughness, Ra (average roughness), Rq (root mean square roughness), and Rz (maximum peak to valley height) parameters were used. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare intergroup differences. For pairwise comparisons, a Mann- Whitney U test was used.Results:Intergroup comparisons revealed remarkable differences between groups for all parameters. The surface roughness and Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage L*a*b* color values were statistically different from each other for all intergroup comparisons (p , .001).Conclusion:Having different color options for aesthetic wires gives clinicians an advantage in terms of the ability to choose archwires that are more harmonious with individual teeth in terms of bracket color and thus provide a more aesthetic appearance. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a aesthetics 
690 |a archwire 
690 |a color 
690 |a roughness 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 27, Iss 2, Pp 85-89 (2014) 
787 0 |n  http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/mechanical-properties-of-different-aesthetic-archw/53558  
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2528-9659 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2148-9505 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/b7f5846c0e314b7ba10c9931da4d9cb5  |z Connect to this object online.