Comparison of Different Implant Systems by Stress and Resistance of Prosthetic Screws: An Original Research

Introduction: For the best possible clinical results, dental implant systems must have their biomechanical characteristics thoroughly evaluated. These systems are essential to restorative dentistry. The purpose of this study was to analyze the resistance and stress distribution of prosthetic screws...

Volledige beschrijving

Bewaard in:
Bibliografische gegevens
Hoofdauteur: Pramod Punchiri Sadan (Auteur)
Formaat: Boek
Gepubliceerd in: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2024-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Onderwerpen:
Online toegang:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Voeg label toe
Geen labels, Wees de eerste die dit record labelt!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_b88df62b3cc74c3fa7d3d59c201c808b
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Pramod Punchiri Sadan  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparison of Different Implant Systems by Stress and Resistance of Prosthetic Screws: An Original Research 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2024-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0976-4879 
500 |a 0975-7406 
500 |a 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_381_24 
520 |a Introduction: For the best possible clinical results, dental implant systems must have their biomechanical characteristics thoroughly evaluated. These systems are essential to restorative dentistry. The purpose of this study was to analyze the resistance and stress distribution of prosthetic screws across five distinct implant systems. Methods: The stress distribution on prosthesis screws was evaluated, and loading conditions were simulated using finite element analysis (FEA). To assess the screws' resistance to torque forces, mechanical testing was done. Findings: Among the implant systems, there were notable differences in torque resistance and stress distribution. System A had the least amount of stress and the most torque resistance, whereas System E displayed the most stress and the least torque resistance. Conclusion: The results emphasize the significance of taking biomechanical characteristics into account when choosing implant systems for clinical usage, which has ramifications for patient care and treatment planning. Additional investigation concentrating on thorough clinical assessments is necessary to confirm these results and enhance treatment plans. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a finite element analysis 
690 |a implant systems 
690 |a prosthetic screws 
690 |a resistance 
690 |a stress analysis 
690 |a Pharmacy and materia medica 
690 |a RS1-441 
690 |a Analytical chemistry 
690 |a QD71-142 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 16, Iss Suppl 3, Pp S2652-S2654 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_381_24 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0976-4879 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0975-7406 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/b88df62b3cc74c3fa7d3d59c201c808b  |z Connect to this object online.