Norwegian general practitioners' collaboration with municipal care providers - a qualitative study of structural conditions

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the structural mechanisms that facilitate or counteract collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and other providers of municipal healthcare. Good collaboration between these actors is crucial for high-quality care, especially for persons in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sissel Steihaug (Author), Bård Paulsen (Author), Line Melby (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Taylor & Francis Group, 2017-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_b92d802e5eb6401d8d9a0fca5d8419e7
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Sissel Steihaug  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Bård Paulsen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Line Melby  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Norwegian general practitioners' collaboration with municipal care providers - a qualitative study of structural conditions 
260 |b Taylor & Francis Group,   |c 2017-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0281-3432 
500 |a 1502-7724 
500 |a 10.1080/02813432.2017.1397264 
520 |a Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the structural mechanisms that facilitate or counteract collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and other providers of municipal healthcare. Good collaboration between these actors is crucial for high-quality care, especially for persons in need of coordinated services. Material and methods: The study is based on semistructured interviews with 12 healthcare providers in four Norwegian municipalities: four GPs, six nurses and two physiotherapists. Results: GPs are key collaborating partners in the healthcare system. Their ability to collaborate is affected by a number of structural conditions. Mostly, this leads to GPs being too little involved in potential collaborative efforts: (i) individual GPs prioritize with whom they want to collaborate among many possible collaborative partners, (ii) inter-municipal constraints hamper GPs in contacting collaboration partners and (iii) GPs fall outside the hospital-municipality collaboration. Conclusions: We argue a common leadership for primary care services is needed. Furthermore, inter-professional work must be a central focus in the planning of primary care services. However, a dedicated staff, sufficient resources, adequate time and proper meeting places are needed to accomplish good collaboration. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Collaboration 
690 |a general practitioner 
690 |a municipal healthcare 
690 |a structural conditions 
690 |a integrated care 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, Vol 35, Iss 4, Pp 344-351 (2017) 
787 0 |n http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2017.1397264 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0281-3432 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1502-7724 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/b92d802e5eb6401d8d9a0fca5d8419e7  |z Connect to this object online.