Stakeholder Participation for Legitimate Priority Setting: A Checklist
Accountable decision-makers are required to legitimize their priority setting decisions in health to members of society. In this perspective we stress the point that fair, legitimate processes should reflect efforts of authorities to treat all stakeholders as moral equals in terms of providing all p...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Maarten P.M. Jansen (Author), Rob Baltussen (Author), Kristine Bærøe (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences,
2018-11-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Legitimate Health Benefit Package Design − Part I: Conceptual Framework
by: Rob Baltussen, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Fair Processes for Priority Setting: Putting Theory into Practice; Comment on "Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy"
by: Maarten P. Jansen, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Mapping of multiple criteria for priority setting of health interventions: an aid for decision makers
by: Tromp Noor, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Global Developments in Priority Setting in Health
by: Rob Baltussen, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness
by: Rob Baltussen, et al.
Published: (2016)