Implementing harm reduction kits in an office-based addiction treatment program

Abstract Background The rising rates of drug use-related complications call for a paradigm shift in the care for people who use drugs. While addiction treatment and harm reduction have historically been siloed in the US, co-location of these services in office-based addiction treatment (OBAT) settin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Margaret Shang (Author), Brent Thiel (Author), Jane M. Liebschutz (Author), Kevin L. Kraemer (Author), Ariana Freund (Author), Raagini Jawa (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2023-11-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_b9d22a0b715c45cc844da9b64fa02fce
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Margaret Shang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Brent Thiel  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jane M. Liebschutz  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kevin L. Kraemer  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ariana Freund  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Raagini Jawa  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Implementing harm reduction kits in an office-based addiction treatment program 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2023-11-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12954-023-00897-5 
500 |a 1477-7517 
520 |a Abstract Background The rising rates of drug use-related complications call for a paradigm shift in the care for people who use drugs. While addiction treatment and harm reduction have historically been siloed in the US, co-location of these services in office-based addiction treatment (OBAT) settings offers a more realistic and patient-centered approach. We describe a quality improvement program on integrating harm reduction kits into an urban OBAT clinic. Methods After engaging appropriate stakeholders and delivering clinician and staff trainings on safer use best practices, we developed a clinical workflow for universal offering and distribution of pre-packaged kits coupled with patient-facing educational handouts. We assessed: (1) kit uptake with kit number and types distributed; and (2) implementation outcomes of feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and patient perceptions. Results One-month post-implementation, 28% (40/141) of completed in-person visits had at least one kit request, and a total of 121 kits were distributed. Staff and clinicians found the program to be highly feasible, acceptable, and appropriate, and patient perceptions were positive. Conclusions Incorporating kits in OBAT settings is an important step toward increasing patient access and utilization of life-saving services. Our program uncovered a significant unmet need among our patients, suggesting that kit integration within addiction treatment can improve the standard of care for people who use drugs. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Harm reduction 
690 |a Safer use equipment 
690 |a Office-based addiction treatment 
690 |a Substance use disorder 
690 |a Addiction 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Harm Reduction Journal, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-023-00897-5 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1477-7517 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/b9d22a0b715c45cc844da9b64fa02fce  |z Connect to this object online.