Artificial intelligence breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in the BI-RADS categorization of breast lesions: A pilot head to head comparison study in screening program

BackgroundArtificial intelligence breast ultrasound diagnostic system (AIBUS) has been introduced as an alternative approach for handheld ultrasound (HHUS), while their results in BI-RADS categorization has not been compared.MethodsThis pilot study was based on a screening program conducted from May...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaoxi Huang (Author), Youhui Qiu (Author), Fangfang Bao (Author), Juanhua Wang (Author), Caifeng Lin (Author), Yan Lin (Author), Jianhang Wu (Author), Haomin Yang (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ba0319d367cf41359f7b22ae937a41d4
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Xiaoxi Huang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Youhui Qiu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Fangfang Bao  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Juanhua Wang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Caifeng Lin  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yan Lin  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jianhang Wu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Haomin Yang  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Artificial intelligence breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in the BI-RADS categorization of breast lesions: A pilot head to head comparison study in screening program 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2296-2565 
500 |a 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1098639 
520 |a BackgroundArtificial intelligence breast ultrasound diagnostic system (AIBUS) has been introduced as an alternative approach for handheld ultrasound (HHUS), while their results in BI-RADS categorization has not been compared.MethodsThis pilot study was based on a screening program conducted from May 2020 to October 2020 in southeast China. All the participants who received both HHUS and AIBUS were included in the study (N = 344). The ultrasound videos after AIBUS scanning were independently watched by a senior radiologist and a junior radiologist. Agreement rate and weighted Kappa value were used to compare their results in BI-RADS categorization with HHUS.ResultsThe detection rate of breast nodules by HHUS was 14.83%, while the detection rates were 34.01% for AIBUS videos watched by a senior radiologist and 35.76% when watched by a junior radiologist. After AIBUS scanning, the weighted Kappa value for BI-RADS categorization between videos watched by senior radiologists and HHUS was 0.497 (p < 0.001) with an agreement rate of 78.8%, indicating its potential use in breast cancer screening. However, the Kappa value of AIBUS videos watched by junior radiologist was 0.39, when comparing to HHUS.ConclusionAIBUS breast scan can obtain relatively clear images and detect more breast nodules. The results of AIBUS scanning watched by senior radiologists are moderately consistent with HHUS and might be used in screening practice, especially in primary health care with limited numbers of radiologists. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a artificial intelligence 
690 |a breast ultrasound 
690 |a agreement 
690 |a breast cancer 
690 |a cancer screening (MeSH) 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontiers in Public Health, Vol 10 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1098639/full 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2296-2565 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ba0319d367cf41359f7b22ae937a41d4  |z Connect to this object online.