Novel Zirconia Surface Treatments for Enhanced Osseointegration: Laboratory Characterization

Purpose. The aim of this study was to evaluate three novel surface treatments intended to improve osseointegration of zirconia implants: selective infiltration etching treatment (SIE), fusion sputtering (FS), and low pressure particle abrasion (LPPA). The effects of surface treatments on roughness,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ola H. Ewais (Author), Fayza Al Abbassy (Author), Mona M. Ghoneim (Author), Moustafa N. Aboushelib (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Hindawi Limited, 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ba18f42d6c0e44cdb60b1adb511906d7
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Ola H. Ewais  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Fayza Al Abbassy  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mona M. Ghoneim  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Moustafa N. Aboushelib  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Novel Zirconia Surface Treatments for Enhanced Osseointegration: Laboratory Characterization 
260 |b Hindawi Limited,   |c 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1687-8728 
500 |a 1687-8736 
500 |a 10.1155/2014/203940 
520 |a Purpose. The aim of this study was to evaluate three novel surface treatments intended to improve osseointegration of zirconia implants: selective infiltration etching treatment (SIE), fusion sputtering (FS), and low pressure particle abrasion (LPPA). The effects of surface treatments on roughness, topography, hardness, and porosity of implants were also assessed. Materials and Methods. 45 zirconia discs (19 mm in diameter × 3 mm in thickness) received 3 different surface treatments: selective infiltration etching, low pressure particle abrasion with 30 µm alumina, and fusion sputtering while nontreated surface served as control. Surface roughness was evaluated quantitatively using profilometery, porosity was evaluated using mercury prosimetry, and Vickers microhardness was used to assess surface hardness. Surface topography was analyzed using scanning and atomic force microscopy (α=0.05). Results. There were significant differences between all groups regarding surface roughness (F=1678, P<0.001), porosity (F=3278, P<0.001), and hardness (F=1106.158, P<0.001). Scanning and atomic force microscopy revealed a nanoporous surface characteristic of SIE, and FS resulted in the creation of surface microbeads, while LPPA resulted in limited abrasion of the surface. Conclusion. Within the limitations of the study, changes in surface characteristics and topography of zirconia implants have been observed after different surface treatment approaches. Thus possibilities for enhanced osseointegration could be additionally offered. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n International Journal of Dentistry, Vol 2014 (2014) 
787 0 |n http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/203940 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1687-8728 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1687-8736 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ba18f42d6c0e44cdb60b1adb511906d7  |z Connect to this object online.