Effectiveness and safety of atosiban versus conventional treatment in the management of preterm labor
Objective: To compare the efficacy of atosiban with conventional treatment of the threatened preterm labor. Materials and methods: All the data of pregnant women with threatened preterm labor from January 1 to December 31, 2017, who received atosiban were collected. Pregnant women with conventional...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Yan Yu (Author), Zhi Yang (Author), Liya Wu (Author), Yuanfang Zhu (Author), Fang Guo (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Elsevier,
2020-09-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Management of preterm labor: atosiban or nifedipine?
by: Roel de Heus, et al.
Published: (2010) -
Critical appraisal and clinical utility of atosiban in the management of preterm labor
by: Olaleye Sanu, et al.
Published: (2010) -
Atosiban versus betamimetics in the treatment of preterm labour in Germany: an economic evaluation
by: Connolly Mark, et al.
Published: (2009) -
Arrest of mouse preterm labor until term delivery by combination therapy with atosiban and mundulone, a natural product with tocolytic efficacy
by: Shajila Siricilla, et al.
Published: (2023) -
A multicenter, retrospective comparison of pregnancy outcomes between groups of preterm labor nulliparous mothers treated with atosiban vs. ritodrine in singleton and multiple pregnancies
by: Guk Won Kim, et al.
Published: (2023)