Non-Surgical Therapy for Peri-Implant Diseases: a Systematic Review

Objectives: The purpose of this paper was to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of non-surgical therapy for the treatment of peri-implant diseases including both, mucositis and peri-implantitis lesions. Material and Methods: An electronic search in two different databases was performed includ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernando Suárez-López del Amo (Author), Shan-Huey Yu (Author), Hom-Lay Wang (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Stilus Optimus, 2016-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ba62bc331f524051a2cb345d24d48d24
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Fernando Suárez-López del Amo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Shan-Huey Yu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hom-Lay Wang  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Non-Surgical Therapy for Peri-Implant Diseases: a Systematic Review 
260 |b Stilus Optimus,   |c 2016-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.5037/jomr.2016.7313 
500 |a 2029-283X 
520 |a Objectives: The purpose of this paper was to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of non-surgical therapy for the treatment of peri-implant diseases including both, mucositis and peri-implantitis lesions. Material and Methods: An electronic search in two different databases was performed including MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE from 2011 to 2016. Human studies reporting non-surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis with more than 10 implants and at least 6 months follow up published in English language were evaluated. A systematic review was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the different methods of decontamination employed in the included investigations. Risk of bias assessment was elaborated for included investigations. Results: Twenty-five articles were identified of which 14 were further evaluated and included in the analysis. Due to significant heterogeneity in between included studies, a meta-analysis could not be performed. Instead, a systematic descriptive review was performed. Included investigations reported the used of different methods for implant decontamination, including self-performed cleaning techniques, and professionally delivered treatment such as laser, photodynamic therapy, supra-/sub-mucosal mechanical debridement, and air-abrasive devices. Follow-up periods ranged from 6 to 60 months. Conclusions: Non-surgical treatment for peri-implant mucositis seems to be effective while modest and not-predictable outcomes are expected for peri-implantitis lesions. Limitations include different peri-implant diseases definitions, treatment approaches, as well as different implant designs/surfaces and defect characteristics. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a antibiotic prophylaxis 
690 |a dental scaling 
690 |a local anti-infective agents 
690 |a peri-implantitis 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research, Vol 7, Iss 3, p e13 (2016) 
787 0 |n http://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2016/3/e13/v7n3e13ht.htm 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2029-283X 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ba62bc331f524051a2cb345d24d48d24  |z Connect to this object online.