Making All Children Count: Teach For All and the Universalizing Appeal of Data

In this paper, we argue that in order to bind Teach For All's universal/izing statement of problems and solutions to the specificities and the special conditions of member programs' local contexts, what is needed is a shared set of discursive practices, a way of bringing together the commo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Friedrich (Author), Mia Walter (Author), Erica Colmenares (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Arizona State University, 2015-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_bb2f30b47c9e4ce1b983ac6136e38ec0
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Daniel Friedrich  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mia Walter  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Erica Colmenares  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Making All Children Count: Teach For All and the Universalizing Appeal of Data 
260 |b Arizona State University,   |c 2015-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1068-2341 
500 |a 10.14507/epaa.v23.1797 
520 |a In this paper, we argue that in order to bind Teach For All's universal/izing statement of problems and solutions to the specificities and the special conditions of member programs' local contexts, what is needed is a shared set of discursive practices, a way of bringing together the commonalities found in each country while separating the noise of particular politics and histories. That common set of discursive practices is shaped around the notion of data. This paper is structured as follows: First, we contextualize Teach for All by (briefly) juxtaposing the universal and specific elements of the network, including the organization's mission, target population, its recruits (and recruiting tactics), vision, and its production of a particular kind of teacher. Then, we present the two competing, yet complementary, logics of data that are at play in Teach for All - the use of data itself and the notion of data speak - along with their underlying assumptions. We conclude by questioning the logics of this set of discursive practices, and outline our skepticism regarding how data is mobilized to produce particular subjectivities and objects. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a ES 
546 |a PT 
690 |a data interpretation 
690 |a teacher education 
690 |a globalization 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Education Policy Analysis Archives, Vol 23, Iss 0 (2015) 
787 0 |n https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1797 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1068-2341 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/bb2f30b47c9e4ce1b983ac6136e38ec0  |z Connect to this object online.