The effect of implant and abutment diameter on peri-implant bone stress: A three-dimensional finite element analysis

Introduction: Load transfer mechanisms from the implant to surrounding bone and failure of osseointegrated implants are affected by implant geometry and mechanical properties of the site of placement as well as crestal bone resorption. Estimation of such effects allows for a correct design of implan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helen Mary Abraham (Author), Jacob Mathew Philip (Author), Ashish R Jain (Author), C J Venkatakrishnan (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_bb9528748934421894203c4b1569c6cc
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Helen Mary Abraham  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jacob Mathew Philip  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ashish R Jain  |e author 
700 1 0 |a C J Venkatakrishnan  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The effect of implant and abutment diameter on peri-implant bone stress: A three-dimensional finite element analysis 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2249-4987 
500 |a 2394-2541 
500 |a 10.4103/2249-4987.192136 
520 |a Introduction: Load transfer mechanisms from the implant to surrounding bone and failure of osseointegrated implants are affected by implant geometry and mechanical properties of the site of placement as well as crestal bone resorption. Estimation of such effects allows for a correct design of implant geometry to minimize crestal bone loss and implant failure. Objectives: To evaluate the effect of implant and abutment diameter on stress distribution in the peri-implant area. Materials and Methods: Three-dimensional finite element models created to replicate completely osseointegrated endosseous titanium implants and were used for the purpose of stress analysis. Two study groups that consisting of a regular platform (RP) group and narrow platform (NP) group were used with a standard bone density and loaded using the ANSYS Workbench software to calculate the von Mises and Principal (maximum tensile and minimum compressive) stress. Results: The von Mises, compressive, and tensile stresses in the peri-implant bone were lower in the RP model compared to the NP model. Conclusion: RP model yielded a positive result with regard to lowering of peri-implant bone stress levels, in healthy as well as compromised bone qualities when compared to NP designs. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Abutment diameter 
690 |a bone stress 
690 |a implant diameter 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Oral Research and Review, Vol 8, Iss 2, Pp 49-52 (2016) 
787 0 |n http://www.jorr.org/article.asp?issn=2249-4987;year=2016;volume=8;issue=2;spage=49;epage=52;aulast=Abraham 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2249-4987 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2394-2541 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/bb9528748934421894203c4b1569c6cc  |z Connect to this object online.