Assessment of Metformin Intolerance: A Retrospective Chart Review

Objective: The aim of the present study is to determine similarities between patients with type 2 diabetes not on metformin therapy compared to patients on metformin therapy at a resident-led primary care clinic. Methods: An exploratory, single-center retrospective chart review was performed on pati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pilar Murphy (Author), Alanna Bramwell-Shittu (Author), Kaci Boehmer (Author), Jacob Painter (Author), Ruchira Mahashabde (Author)
Format: Book
Published: University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing, 2024-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_bc2e800efa9e4af0b5b9b4c6962b0bb2
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Pilar Murphy  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Alanna Bramwell-Shittu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kaci Boehmer  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jacob Painter  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ruchira Mahashabde  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Assessment of Metformin Intolerance: A Retrospective Chart Review 
260 |b University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing,   |c 2024-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.24926/iip.v15i3.5779 
500 |a 2155-0417 
520 |a Objective: The aim of the present study is to determine similarities between patients with type 2 diabetes not on metformin therapy compared to patients on metformin therapy at a resident-led primary care clinic. Methods: An exploratory, single-center retrospective chart review was performed on patients 18 years and older with a documented diagnosis of type 2 diabetes seen at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Family Medicine Clinic in Little Rock, Arkansas. Of the 2452 patients who met criteria for the study, 1085 patients did not have a documented metformin allergy. A subset of 216 patients who were not currently prescribed metformin and had no documented metformin allergy were further examined and compared to the 869 patients who were prescribed metformin. We sought to determine reasons for nonuse by evaluating their EPIC electronic health record. Information on these patients such as race, gender, hemoglobin A1c (A1c), kidney function, stated metformin intolerance, and comorbid disease states such as neuropathy, chronic kidney disease (CKD), ulcerative colitis, and irritable bowel syndrome were collected. Further examination was performed to determine why patients were not on metformin therapy and potential similarities between metformin intolerant patients. Results: The results of the study indicated a significant difference between metformin users and non-users in relation to body mass index (BMI) and diagnosis of CKD. Metformin non-users were found to have significantly lower mean BMI (30.87 vs. 35.43; p-value <0.0001), and significantly higher rates of CKD (25.93% vs 14.73%; p-value <0.0001) as compared to metformin users. BMI value of patients (coefficient: 0.2033, p value: <0.0001) was found to be significantly and positively correlated with metformin use, and CKD (coefficient: - 0.1191, p-value: <0.0001) was found to be significantly and negatively correlated with metformin use. A1c levels for patients not on metformin therapy were evaluated. Most non-metformin patients fell in prediabetic A1c levels ranging from 5-6.4% (84 patients; 38.89%), and 31 patients (14.35%) should be on insulin therapy according to guidelines. Conclusion: The results demonstrated that patients with lower BMI, CKD, or A1c in the prediabetic range were less likely to be prescribed metformin. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Metformin 
690 |a Intolerance 
690 |a Diabetes 
690 |a Counseling 
690 |a Pharmacy and materia medica 
690 |a RS1-441 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy, Vol 15, Iss 3 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/innovations/article/view/5779 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2155-0417 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/bc2e800efa9e4af0b5b9b4c6962b0bb2  |z Connect to this object online.