Can systematic implementation support improve programme fidelity by improving care providers' perceptions of implementation factors? A cluster randomized trial
Abstract Background Investigations of implementation factors (e.g., collegial support and sense of coherence) are recommended to better understand and address inadequate implementation outcomes. Little is known about the relationship between implementation factors and outcomes, especially in later p...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Miriam Hartveit (Author), Einar Hovlid (Author), John Øvretveit (Author), Jørg Assmus (Author), Gary Bond (Author), Inge Joa (Author), Kristin Heiervang (Author), Bjørn Stensrud (Author), Tordis Sørensen Høifødt (Author), Eva Biringer (Author), Torleif Ruud (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
BMC,
2022-06-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Measuring implementation: development of the implementation process assessment tool (IPAT)
by: M. Hartveit, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Continuity of care as experienced by mental health service users - a qualitative study
by: Eva Biringer, et al.
Published: (2017) -
The impact of referral letter quality on timely access to specialised mental health care: a quantitative study of the reliability of patient triage
by: Marit Nymoen, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Implementing Clinical Guidelines for the Treatment of Psychosis: The Frontline Leaders’ Point of View. A Qualitative Study
by: Nordin HMA, et al.
Published: (2024) -
What Might Be Required for Inspections to Be Considered Fair?; Comment on "What Lies Behind Successful Regulation? A Qualitative Evaluation of Pilot Implementation of Kenya's Health Facility Inspection Reforms"
by: Gunnar Husabø, et al.
Published: (2023)