Evaluating the K-13 Versus Merdeka Curriculum : Impacts on Primary, Junior, and Senior High School Education in Indonesia

This study aims to evaluate the impacts of the 2013 Curriculum and the Merdeka Curriculum on primary, junior, and senior high school education in Indonesia. The 2013 Curriculum was introduced to enhance critical thinking, creativity, and character education, while the Merdeka Curriculum emphasizes g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Endra Priawasana (Author), Singgih Subiyantoro (Author)
Format: Book
Published: LPPM Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, 2024-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_bcbb2f22d7e24fab8233881298ac1295
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Endra Priawasana  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Singgih Subiyantoro  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Evaluating the K-13 Versus Merdeka Curriculum : Impacts on Primary, Junior, and Senior High School Education in Indonesia 
260 |b LPPM Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika,   |c 2024-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2442-7667 
500 |a 10.33394/jk.v10i3.12060 
520 |a This study aims to evaluate the impacts of the 2013 Curriculum and the Merdeka Curriculum on primary, junior, and senior high school education in Indonesia. The 2013 Curriculum was introduced to enhance critical thinking, creativity, and character education, while the Merdeka Curriculum emphasizes greater flexibility, independence, and student-centered learning approaches. This study used a mixed-methods with a comparative analysis to assess educational outcomes, teacher and student adaptability, and overall satisfaction within these distinct curricular contexts. Data was collected via surveys, interviews, and academic performance metrics from a representative sample of schools across different regions of Indonesia. Quantitative data from surveys were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential statistics, including t-tests and ANOVA, to compare student engagement levels and academic performance under both curricula. Qualitative data from interviews and observations were coded and analyzed thematically to capture the nuanced experiences and perceptions of teachers and students. Research findings show that the 2013 Curriculum and the Merdeka Curriculum have their strengths and weaknesses, the latter is generally viewed more favorably by teachers and students for its emphasis on flexibility, learner autonomy, and holistic development. The Merdeka Curriculum has shown promise in fostering student engagement, critical thinking skills, and creativity, yet challenges persist in terms of implementation, teacher training, and resource allocation. A novel finding of this research is the significant improvement in holistic assessment practices under the Merdeka Curriculum, which better captures student competencies beyond standardized testing. Additionally, the study highlights the critical role of equitable resource allocation and continuous professional development for teachers in the successful implementation of curriculum reforms. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a ID 
690 |a evaluation 
690 |a k-13 
690 |a merdeka curriculum. 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Jurnal Kependidikan, Vol 10, Iss 3, Pp 859-867 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://e-journal.undikma.ac.id/index.php/jurnalkependidikan/article/view/12060 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2442-7667 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/bcbb2f22d7e24fab8233881298ac1295  |z Connect to this object online.