Inconsistent approaches of the G-BA regarding acceptance of primary study endpoints as being relevant to patients - an analysis of three disease areas: oncological, metabolic, and infectious diseases
Abstract Background Previous evaluations of oncological medicines in the German early benefit assessment (EBA) procedure have demonstrated inconsistent acceptance of endpoints by regulatory authorities and the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA). Accepted standard endpoints for regulatory purposes are fr...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Thomas Staab (Author), Georg Isbary (Author), Volker E. Amelung (Author), Jörg Ruof (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
BMC,
2016-11-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
A multistate platform model for time‐to‐event endpoints in oncology clinical trials
by: Chih‐Wei Lin, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Gnathostomiasis: an emerging infectious disease relevant to all dermatologists
by: Francisco Bravo, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Measuring Competition: Inconsistent definitions, inconsistent results.
by: Matthew Allen Linick
Published: (2014) -
Measurement error and bias in real-world oncology endpoints when constructing external control arms
by: Benjamin Ackerman, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Editorial: Is there still room for pharmacogenetics in 2023? The cases of infectious diseases and oncology
by: Alessandra Manca, et al.
Published: (2024)