A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of iguratimod in the treatment of inflammatory arthritis and degenerative arthritis

ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of iguratimod (IGU) in the treatment of inflammatory arthritis and degenerative arthritis.MethodsInitially, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on using IGU in treating inflammatory arthritis and degenerative arthritis were systematically gathered from vari...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhiyong Long (Author), Liuting Zeng (Author), Kailin Yang (Author), Junpeng Chen (Author), Yanfang Luo (Author), Charles C. Dai (Author), Qi He (Author), Ying Deng (Author), Anqi Ge (Author), Xiaofei Zhu (Author), Wensa Hao (Author), Lingyun Sun (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of iguratimod (IGU) in the treatment of inflammatory arthritis and degenerative arthritis.MethodsInitially, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on using IGU in treating inflammatory arthritis and degenerative arthritis were systematically gathered from various databases up to February 2024. Subsequently, two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, assessed the risk of bias in included studies, and conducted a meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4 software.ResultsFifty-four RCTs involving three inflammatory arthritis were included, including ankylosing spondylitis (AS), osteoarthritis (OA), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). For AS, the meta-analysis results showed that IGU may decrease BASDAI (SMD −1.68 [−2.32, −1.03], P < 0.00001) and BASFI (WMD −1.29 [−1.47, −1.11], P < 0.00001); IGU may also decrease inflammatory factor [ESR: (WMD −10.33 [−14.96, −5.70], P < 0.0001); CRP: (WMD −10.11 [−14.55, −5.66], P < 0.00001); TNF-α: (WMD −6.22 [−7.97, −4.47], P < 0.00001)]. For OA, the meta-analysis results showed that IGU may decrease VAS (WMD −2.20 [−2.38, −2.01], P < 0.00001) and WOMAC (WMD −7.27 [−12.31, −2.24], P = 0.005); IGU may also decrease IL-6 (WMD −8.72 [−10.00, −7.45], P < 0.00001). For RA, the meta-analysis results showed that IGU may improve RA remission rate [ACR20: (RR 1.18 [1.02, 1.35], P = 0.02); ACR50: (RR 1.32 [1.05, 1.64], P = 0.02); ACR70: (RR 1.44 [1.02, 2.04], P = 0.04)] and decrease DAS28 (WMD −0.92 [−1.20, −0.63], P < 0.00001); IGU may also decrease inflammatory factors [CRP: (SMD −1.36 [−1.75, −0.96], P < 0.00001); ESR: (WMD −9.09 [−11.80, −6.38], P < 0.00001); RF: (SMD −1.21 [−1.69, −0.73], P < 0.00001)]. Regarding safety, adding IGU will not increase the incidence of adverse events.ConclusionIGU might emerge as a promising and secure therapeutic modality for addressing AS, OA, and RA.Systematic Review RegistrationIdentifier PROSPERO: CRD42021289249
Item Description:1663-9812
10.3389/fphar.2024.1440584