Reply to Hammer, M.R. A Response to Punti and Dingel's Critique of the Validity of the Intercultural Development Inventory for BIPOC Students. Comment on "Punti, G.; Dingel, M. Rethinking Race, Ethnicity, and the Assessment of Intercultural Competence in Higher Education. <i>Educ. Sci.</i> 2021, <i>11</i>, 110"
Hammer claims that the IDI has been validated for BIPOC in the US, but after careful re-examination of the data we presented, we reiterate that there is no evidence of this validation. The studies provided by Hammer reveal how the development of the IDI instrument and its validation focused on <i...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Published: |
MDPI AG,
2022-03-01T00:00:00Z.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Hammer claims that the IDI has been validated for BIPOC in the US, but after careful re-examination of the data we presented, we reiterate that there is no evidence of this validation. The studies provided by Hammer reveal how the development of the IDI instrument and its validation focused on <i>international</i> cultural experiences not on cultural diversity <i>within</i> the US. There was no validity testing done on a racially diverse sample of U.S. Americans, and our qualitative data questions the validity for BIPOC individuals from the US. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | 10.3390/educsci12030180 2227-7102 |