Patients' perspectives on the use of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale self-assessment version in primary care

Objective: The aim of the current study was to better understand how patients with depression perceive the use of MADRS-S in primary care consultations with GPs. Design: Qualitative study. Focus group discussion and analysis through Systematic Text Condensation. Setting: Primary Health Care, Region...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carl Wikberg (Author), Agneta Pettersson (Author), Jeanette Westman (Author), Cecilia Björkelund (Author), Eva-Lisa Petersson (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Taylor & Francis Group, 2016-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_c14d7862d15e49409e25e881f9ad4d8b
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Carl Wikberg  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Agneta Pettersson  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jeanette Westman  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Cecilia Björkelund  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Eva-Lisa Petersson  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Patients' perspectives on the use of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale self-assessment version in primary care 
260 |b Taylor & Francis Group,   |c 2016-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0281-3432 
500 |a 1502-7724 
500 |a 10.1080/02813432.2016.1248635 
520 |a Objective: The aim of the current study was to better understand how patients with depression perceive the use of MADRS-S in primary care consultations with GPs. Design: Qualitative study. Focus group discussion and analysis through Systematic Text Condensation. Setting: Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden. Subjects: Nine patients with mild/moderate depression who participated in a RCT evaluating the effects of regular use of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Self-assessment scale (MADRS-S) during the GP consultations. Main Outcome measure: Patients' experiences and perceptions of the use of MADRS-S in primary care. Results: Three categories emerged from the analysis: (I) confirmation; MADRS-S shows that I have depression and how serious it is, (II) centeredness; the most important thing is for the GP to listen to and take me seriously and (III) clarification; MADRS-S helps me understand why I need treatment for depression. Conclusion: Use of MADRS-S was perceived as a confirmation for the patients that they had depression and how serious it was. MADRS-S showed the patients something black on white that describes and confirms the diagnosis. The informants emphasized the importance of patient-centeredness; of being listened to and to be taken seriously during the consultation. Use of self-assessment scales such as MADRS-S could find its place, but needs to adjust to the multifaceted environment that primary care provides.Key Points Patients with depression in primary care perceive that the use of a self-assessment scale in the consultation purposefully can contribute in several ways. The scale contributes to Confirmation: MADRS-S shows that I have depression and how serious it is. Centeredness: The most important thing is for the GP to listen to and take me seriously. Clarification: MADRS-S helps me understand why I need treatment for depression. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Depression 
690 |a self-assessment scale 
690 |a focus group 
690 |a primary care 
690 |a communication 
690 |a general practice 
690 |a Sweden 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, Vol 34, Iss 4, Pp 434-442 (2016) 
787 0 |n http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2016.1248635 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0281-3432 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1502-7724 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/c14d7862d15e49409e25e881f9ad4d8b  |z Connect to this object online.