Use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropaenia

Background: Febrile neutropaenia (FN) and resultant infections are the major cause of treatment-related morbidity and mortality in patients receiving chemotherapy. Clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) to reduce the risk of FN and ensuing co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucky L. Shokane (Author), Selente Bezuidenhout (Author), Maryke Lundie (Author)
Format: Book
Published: AOSIS, 2023-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_c1e29b55f8ae4d67bb69c37e181e61d8
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Lucky L. Shokane  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Selente Bezuidenhout  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Maryke Lundie  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropaenia 
260 |b AOSIS,   |c 2023-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1025-9848 
500 |a 2071-9736 
500 |a 10.4102/hsag.v28i0.2221 
520 |a Background: Febrile neutropaenia (FN) and resultant infections are the major cause of treatment-related morbidity and mortality in patients receiving chemotherapy. Clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) to reduce the risk of FN and ensuing complications in patients receiving chemotherapy. Despite these recommendations, inappropriate usage of G-CSF has been reported. Aim: To assess prescribing patterns and adherence to international guidelines of G-CSF in adult patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropaenia (CIN) at the haematology oncology wards of the Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital (DGMAH) and compliance to guidelines. Methods: Medical records of adult patients who received G-CSF were reviewed retrospectively between 01 January 2018 and 31 July 2018. Results: Of the 128 patient files screened, 57 cases met the inclusion criteria. Duration of treatment with G-CSF was not in accordance with guidelines in more than 50% of the patients and in 43.86%, G-CSF dosing deviated from recommended guidelines. Conclusion: The study demonstrated over-prescribing of G-CSF due to either increased doses or duration of G-CSF therapy. Although prescribed for the correct indication, the dosage was often too high or the duration was too long, even once an acceptable neutrophil nadir count was reached. Interventions to optimise the use of G-CSF are required and the pharmacist may play a role in this regard. Contribution: The administration of the correct doses of G-CSF can reduce both the severity and duration of neutropaenia. Over-prescribing and incorrect dosing may contribute to patient morbidity and add to the financial burden of healthcare. 
546 |a AF 
546 |a EN 
690 |a chemotherapy 
690 |a febrile neutropaenia 
690 |a g-csf 
690 |a guidelines compliance 
690 |a dosage 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Health SA Gesondheid: Journal of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Vol 28, Iss 0, Pp e1-e6 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://hsag.co.za/index.php/hsag/article/view/2221 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1025-9848 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2071-9736 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/c1e29b55f8ae4d67bb69c37e181e61d8  |z Connect to this object online.