Evaluating person-centered care in neurological outpatient care: a mixed-methods content validity study

Abstract Background Person-centered care (PCC) is gaining increased attention. PCC concerns the whole person behind the disease and can improve care for people with long-term conditions such as multiple sclerosis (MS) and Parkinson's disease (PD). However, there is a lack of tools to assess PCC...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mia Olsson (Author), Sidona-Valentina Bala (Author), Peter Hagell (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2024-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_c20fedb6bb3f4284831c97c21b2010f7
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Mia Olsson  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sidona-Valentina Bala  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Peter Hagell  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Evaluating person-centered care in neurological outpatient care: a mixed-methods content validity study 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2024-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12912-024-01837-9 
500 |a 1472-6955 
520 |a Abstract Background Person-centered care (PCC) is gaining increased attention. PCC concerns the whole person behind the disease and can improve care for people with long-term conditions such as multiple sclerosis (MS) and Parkinson's disease (PD). However, there is a lack of tools to assess PCC from the patients' perspective, particularly in outpatient care. The Person-Centered Care instrument for outpatient care (PCCoc) is an instrument under development with the intention to fill this gap. The aim of this study was to test the user-friendliness and content validity of the PCCoc as experienced by persons with MS and PD in neurological outpatient care. Methods Twenty persons with MS or PD completed the 35-item PCCoc followed by an interview regarding the instrument's intelligibility and ease of use to assess its user-friendliness. Participants then rated the relevance of each item. These ratings were used to calculate the content validity index (CVI) for individual items (I-CVI) and for the overall scale (S-CVI). Results It took a median of 5 min for participants to complete the PCCoc. Instrument instructions were found clear, items easy to understand, and response categories distinct. No important missing areas were reported. I-CVI values ranged between 0.75 and 1, and S-CVI was 0.96. Conclusions We found support for the user-friendliness and content validity of the PCCoc among persons with MS and PD, suggesting that the PCCoc can be useful for evaluating and developing PCC in neurological outpatient care. Further testing in broader contexts, including psychometric testing, is warranted to establish its usefulness. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Evaluation 
690 |a Multiple sclerosis 
690 |a Neurology 
690 |a Outpatient care 
690 |a Parkinson's disease 
690 |a Person-centered care 
690 |a Nursing 
690 |a RT1-120 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Nursing, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01837-9 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6955 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/c20fedb6bb3f4284831c97c21b2010f7  |z Connect to this object online.