Bacterial contamination of automated MRI contrast injectors in clinical routine
Aim: To quantify the frequency of bacterial contamination of the injected contrast agent/saline solution by an automated contrast injection system, and to evaluate whether usage of a novel tube system can Methods: For bacterial contamination quantification two identical automated piston pump MRI con...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
German Medical Science GMS Publishing House,
2019-05-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_c24f272e01ed47e38cb4904fd8b3a1e0 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Goebel, Juliane |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Steinmann, Joerg |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Heintschel von Heinegg, Evelyn |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Hestermann, Tobias |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Nassenstein, Kai |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Bacterial contamination of automated MRI contrast injectors in clinical routine |
260 | |b German Medical Science GMS Publishing House, |c 2019-05-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 2196-5226 | ||
500 | |a 10.3205/dgkh000321 | ||
520 | |a Aim: To quantify the frequency of bacterial contamination of the injected contrast agent/saline solution by an automated contrast injection system, and to evaluate whether usage of a novel tube system can Methods: For bacterial contamination quantification two identical automated piston pump MRI contrast injectors were used in combination with a standard tube system. 3-5 ml of the contrast agent/saline solution was collected from the system prior to its connection to the patients' venous cannula in 104 consecutive patients. To test, whether a novel tube system reduces contamination, a tube system with shielded screw connections was used with the same contrast injectors and contrast agent/saline samples were collected in further 101 patients. Specimens were microbiologically analyzed. Frequencies of contamination were compared using Fisher exact test.Results: With the standard tube system, bacterial contamination was observed in 5.8% (6 out of 104 specimens). With the novel tube system, contamination was observed in 2.0% (2 out of 101 specimens, p=0.280). was the most common germ followed by (2 cases) and (1 case).Conclusion: Bacterial contaminations of MRI contrast injectors occurred in a non-negligible frequency especially with . A trend towards reduced bacterial contamination was seen when a novel tube system with shielded screw connections was used. | ||
546 | |a DE | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a MR imaging | ||
690 | |a automated contrast injector | ||
690 | |a contrast agent | ||
690 | |a hygiene | ||
690 | |a bacterial contamination | ||
690 | |a Medicine | ||
690 | |a R | ||
690 | |a Public aspects of medicine | ||
690 | |a RA1-1270 | ||
690 | |a Microbiology | ||
690 | |a QR1-502 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n GMS Hygiene and Infection Control, Vol 14, p Doc05 (2019) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/dgkh/2019-14/dgkh000321.shtml | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2196-5226 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/c24f272e01ed47e38cb4904fd8b3a1e0 |z Connect to this object online. |