Bacterial contamination of automated MRI contrast injectors in clinical routine

Aim: To quantify the frequency of bacterial contamination of the injected contrast agent/saline solution by an automated contrast injection system, and to evaluate whether usage of a novel tube system can Methods: For bacterial contamination quantification two identical automated piston pump MRI con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Goebel, Juliane (Author), Steinmann, Joerg (Author), Heintschel von Heinegg, Evelyn (Author), Hestermann, Tobias (Author), Nassenstein, Kai (Author)
Format: Book
Published: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House, 2019-05-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_c24f272e01ed47e38cb4904fd8b3a1e0
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Goebel, Juliane  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Steinmann, Joerg  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Heintschel von Heinegg, Evelyn  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hestermann, Tobias  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Nassenstein, Kai  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Bacterial contamination of automated MRI contrast injectors in clinical routine 
260 |b German Medical Science GMS Publishing House,   |c 2019-05-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2196-5226 
500 |a 10.3205/dgkh000321 
520 |a Aim: To quantify the frequency of bacterial contamination of the injected contrast agent/saline solution by an automated contrast injection system, and to evaluate whether usage of a novel tube system can Methods: For bacterial contamination quantification two identical automated piston pump MRI contrast injectors were used in combination with a standard tube system. 3-5 ml of the contrast agent/saline solution was collected from the system prior to its connection to the patients' venous cannula in 104 consecutive patients. To test, whether a novel tube system reduces contamination, a tube system with shielded screw connections was used with the same contrast injectors and contrast agent/saline samples were collected in further 101 patients. Specimens were microbiologically analyzed. Frequencies of contamination were compared using Fisher exact test.Results: With the standard tube system, bacterial contamination was observed in 5.8% (6 out of 104 specimens). With the novel tube system, contamination was observed in 2.0% (2 out of 101 specimens, p=0.280). was the most common germ followed by (2 cases) and (1 case).Conclusion: Bacterial contaminations of MRI contrast injectors occurred in a non-negligible frequency especially with . A trend towards reduced bacterial contamination was seen when a novel tube system with shielded screw connections was used. 
546 |a DE 
546 |a EN 
690 |a MR imaging 
690 |a automated contrast injector 
690 |a contrast agent 
690 |a hygiene 
690 |a bacterial contamination 
690 |a Medicine 
690 |a R 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
690 |a Microbiology 
690 |a QR1-502 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n GMS Hygiene and Infection Control, Vol 14, p Doc05 (2019) 
787 0 |n http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/dgkh/2019-14/dgkh000321.shtml 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2196-5226 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/c24f272e01ed47e38cb4904fd8b3a1e0  |z Connect to this object online.