Is the association between poor job control and common mental disorder explained by general perceptions of control? Findings from an Australian longitudinal cohort

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the influence of general perceptions of control on the association between job control and mental health. METHODS: We used four waves of data from a cohort of mid-aged adults from the Personality and Total Health (PATH) Through Life Study (baseline N=2106). K...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lay San Too (Author), Liana Leach (Author), Peter Butterworth (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH), 2020-05-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_c39cb5f0baba45e3bc2acb20c9e0932b
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Lay San Too  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Liana Leach  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Peter Butterworth  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Is the association between poor job control and common mental disorder explained by general perceptions of control? Findings from an Australian longitudinal cohort 
260 |b Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH),   |c 2020-05-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0355-3140 
500 |a 1795-990X 
500 |a 10.5271/sjweh.3869 
520 |a OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the influence of general perceptions of control on the association between job control and mental health. METHODS: We used four waves of data from a cohort of mid-aged adults from the Personality and Total Health (PATH) Through Life Study (baseline N=2106). Key measures included job control and likelihood of experiencing a common mental disorder (anxiety and/or depression). The data were analyzed using longitudinal random-intercept regression models, controlling for a range of potential confounders including general perceptions of control (ie, not isolated to the work context) via a measure of mastery. The analyses isolated the effect of within-person changes in job control on mental health (apart from between-person differences). RESULTS: The results show that the effect of job control remained significant after adjusting for general perceptions of control and other confounders. The within-person effect in the model demonstrated that, when workers had low job control, they were twice as likely to experience a common mental disorder [odds ratio (OR) 2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.53‒2.73]. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals' general perceptions of control in life does not account for the association between low job control and poor mental health. The findings add a new layer of evidence to the literature demonstrating that lack of autonomy at work is an independent predictor of employees' mental health. Increasing employee control should be integrated into workplace strategies to promote mental health. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a stress 
690 |a mental health 
690 |a control 
690 |a depression 
690 |a job control 
690 |a australia 
690 |a mental disorder 
690 |a common mental disorder 
690 |a association 
690 |a psychosocial 
690 |a job stressor 
690 |a longitudinal cohort 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, Vol 46, Iss 3, Pp 311-320 (2020) 
787 0 |n  https://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=3869  
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0355-3140 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1795-990X 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/c39cb5f0baba45e3bc2acb20c9e0932b  |z Connect to this object online.