Danish general practitioners as gatekeepers for gynaecological patients in regions with different density of resident specialists in gynaecology: in which situations and to whom do they refer? A cross-sectional study

AbstractBackground There are large differences in the density of Resident Specialists in Gynaecology (RSG) in the various regions of Denmark. It is unknown if this inequality affects the General Practitioner (GP) referral patterns of gynaecological patients.Objective To investigate the GP referral p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexander D. L. Laschke (Author), Jan Blaakær (Author), Charlotte Floridon Jensen (Author), Mette Bach Larsen (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Taylor & Francis Group, 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_c3d3aa91dba140e39adf06a33be28c13
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Alexander D. L. Laschke  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jan Blaakær  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Charlotte Floridon Jensen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mette Bach Larsen  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Danish general practitioners as gatekeepers for gynaecological patients in regions with different density of resident specialists in gynaecology: in which situations and to whom do they refer? A cross-sectional study 
260 |b Taylor & Francis Group,   |c 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1080/02813432.2023.2165085 
500 |a 1502-7724 
500 |a 0281-3432 
520 |a AbstractBackground There are large differences in the density of Resident Specialists in Gynaecology (RSG) in the various regions of Denmark. It is unknown if this inequality affects the General Practitioner (GP) referral patterns of gynaecological patients.Objective To investigate the GP referral patterns of gynaecological patients to the RSG or to the Hospital/Outpatient Clinic (HOC) in specific situations according to the regional density of RSGs. Moreover, to examine whether GPs prefer to refer to the HOC or to the RSG, or whether they were treated by the GP depending on the density of RSGs, specifically, in six benign gynaecological diagnoses.Design A cross-sectional questionnaire survey.Setting In Denmark, GPs serve as gatekeepers to secondary care, being responsible for referrals to resident specialists and in- and outpatient hospital care.Subjects Five hundred Danish GPs were randomly selected and invited to take part in the questionnaire study. Main outcome measurements: Referral patterns: Own treatment, RSG, or HOC.Results GPs prefer to refer their gynaecologic patients to RSGs rather than to HOCs. In addition, the study shows the higher the density of RSGs, the more gynaecological patients are referred to the RSG. This also applies to the six diagnoses examined.Conclusion To allow patients' equal access to specialist care, the density of RSGs must be equal all over the country. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Gatekeeping 
690 |a referral and consultation 
690 |a secondary care 
690 |a gynaecology 
690 |a health services accessibility 
690 |a health equity 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, Vol 41, Iss 1, Pp 52-60 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/02813432.2023.2165085 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0281-3432 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1502-7724 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/c3d3aa91dba140e39adf06a33be28c13  |z Connect to this object online.