Development of a theoretical framework for the creation of assessment tools on parental literacy in child unintentional injury prevention: a literature-based expert consultation study

ObjectiveTo analyze the research findings and development trends of parental safety literacy in relation to child injury prevention, and to establish a theoretical framework for the development of assessment tool on the parental safety literacy. MethodsThe literature, dissertations, expert consensus...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kaiyue CHEN (Author), Xiaohong LI (Author), Jicui ZHENG (Author), Xueqi MA (Author), Qian ZHAO (Author), Jingwei XIA (Author), Jun LÜ (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2024-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_c4a377ee49cb49f3a0dbeee5d6b639c5
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Kaiyue CHEN  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Xiaohong LI  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jicui ZHENG  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Xueqi MA  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Qian ZHAO  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jingwei XIA  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jun LÜ  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Development of a theoretical framework for the creation of assessment tools on parental literacy in child unintentional injury prevention: a literature-based expert consultation study 
260 |b Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Public Health,   |c 2024-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1001-0580 
500 |a 10.11847/zgggws1142470 
520 |a ObjectiveTo analyze the research findings and development trends of parental safety literacy in relation to child injury prevention, and to establish a theoretical framework for the development of assessment tool on the parental safety literacy. MethodsThe literature, dissertations, expert consensus, and guidelines related to the assessment of unintentional injuries in children and health literacy tools published from January 1, 2002 to January 1, 2022 were retrieved from various databases including CNKI, Wanfang Dara, CQVIP, PubMed, and Web of Science. After conducting a comprehensive screening and analysis of the current state and identified shortcomings in 41 domestic and international articles concerning the assessment tools for children's unintentional injuries and health literacy, a preliminary framework for evaluating tool dimensions was established. Based on the principles of involving multiple stakeholders and achieving information saturation, a panel consisting of 18 experts was selected for group discussions or one-on-one consultations. This process resulted in the development of a preliminary framework for the assessment tool based on expert opinions. ResultsA total of 13 universal health literacy assessment tools and 28 specific health literacy assessment tools were obtained through a systematic literature search. The universal assessment tool comprehensively measures health literacy based on its definition, while the specific assessment tool focuses on measuring certain dimensions of health literacy. Consultation with 18 experts revealed that a systematic and comprehensive understanding of the concept of literacy forms the basis for evaluating parents' safety literacy, and the objective of the assessment tool for parents' safety literacy should be to identify high-risk parents. The final evaluation framework encompasses five dimensions: access, understanding, belief, communication, and utilization. ConclusionCurrently, there is a shortage of assessment tools in China that comprehensively measure parental health literacy across all dimensions. To create a complete health literacy scale suitable for application, further summarization of the assessment dimensions of the scales is necessary. 
546 |a ZH 
690 |a children 
690 |a unintentional injury 
690 |a health literacy 
690 |a assessment tool 
690 |a framework research 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Zhongguo gonggong weisheng, Vol 40, Iss 4, Pp 408-412 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://www.zgggws.com/article/doi/10.11847/zgggws1142470 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1001-0580 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/c4a377ee49cb49f3a0dbeee5d6b639c5  |z Connect to this object online.