Do Running and Strength Exercises Reduce Daily Muscle Inactivity Time?

Understanding how a specific exercise changes daily activity patterns is important when designing physical activity interventions. We examined the effects of strength and interval running exercise sessions on daily activity patterns using recordings of quadriceps and hamstring muscle electromyograph...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taija Finni (Author), Marja Uusi-Vähälä (Author), Arto J. Pesola (Author), Ritva S. Taipale (Author)
Format: Book
Published: AIMS Press, 2016-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_c547e92febc447e6a38a7eb8d9e2e9dd
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Taija Finni  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Marja Uusi-Vähälä  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Arto J. Pesola  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ritva S. Taipale  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Do Running and Strength Exercises Reduce Daily Muscle Inactivity Time? 
260 |b AIMS Press,   |c 2016-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2327-8994 
500 |a 10.3934/publichealth.2016.4.702 
520 |a Understanding how a specific exercise changes daily activity patterns is important when designing physical activity interventions. We examined the effects of strength and interval running exercise sessions on daily activity patterns using recordings of quadriceps and hamstring muscle electromyographic (EMG) activity and inactivity. Five male and five female subjects taking part in a 10-week training programme containing both strength and interval running training sessions were measured for daily muscle EMG activities during three days: on a strength day, an interval running day, and a day without exercise. EMG was measured using textile electrodes embedded into sport shorts that were worn 9.1 ± 1.4 hours/day and results are given as % of recording time. During the total measurement time the muscles were inactive 55 ± 26%, 53 ± 30% and 71 ± 12% during strength training day, interval running day, and day without exercise (n.s.). When compared to the day without exercise, the change in muscle inactivity correlated negatively with change in light muscle activity in strength (r = -0.971,<em>p</em>< 0.001) and interval running days (r = -0.965,<em>p</em>< 0.001). While interval running exercise bout induced a more systematic decrease in muscle inactivity time (from 62 ± 15% to 6 ± 6%,<em>p</em>< 0.001), reductions in muscle inactivity in response to strength exercise were highly individual (range 5-70 pp) despite the same training programme. Strength, but not running exercise bout, increased muscle activity levels occurring above 50% MVC (<em>p</em>< 0.05) when compared to a similar period without exercise. The effect of strength exercise bout on totaldaily recording time increased the EMG amplitudes across the entire intensity spectrum. While strength and interval running exercise are effective in increasing muscle moderate-to-vigorous activity when compared to a similar period without exercise, it comprises only a small part of the day and does not seem to have a systematic effect neither to reduce nor induce compensatory increase in the daily muscle inactivity that is highly heterogeneous between individuals. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a muscle inactivity 
690 |a muscle activity 
690 |a physical activity 
690 |a strength 
690 |a endurance 
690 |a combined training 
690 |a daily sedentary time 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n AIMS Public Health, Vol 3, Iss 4, Pp 702-721 (2016) 
787 0 |n http://www.aimspress.com/aimsph/article/969/fulltext.html 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2327-8994 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/c547e92febc447e6a38a7eb8d9e2e9dd  |z Connect to this object online.