Examining the Impact of Polygenic Risk Information in Primary Care

Background: Polygenic risk testing examines variation across multiple genes to estimate a risk score for a particular disease, including risk scores for many common, chronic health conditions. Although polygenic risk information (PRI) may be a promising tool for enhancing preventive counseling and f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joel E. Pacyna (Author), Jackson S. Ennis (Author), Iftikhar J. Kullo (Author), Richard R. Sharp (Author)
Format: Book
Published: SAGE Publishing, 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_c63b50e0f44e4f0aa6982c5e1e33d3dd
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Joel E. Pacyna  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jackson S. Ennis  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Iftikhar J. Kullo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Richard R. Sharp  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Examining the Impact of Polygenic Risk Information in Primary Care 
260 |b SAGE Publishing,   |c 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2150-1327 
500 |a 10.1177/21501319231151766 
520 |a Background: Polygenic risk testing examines variation across multiple genes to estimate a risk score for a particular disease, including risk scores for many common, chronic health conditions. Although polygenic risk information (PRI) may be a promising tool for enhancing preventive counseling and facilitating early identification of disease, its potential impact on primary-care encounters and disease prevention efforts has not been well characterized. Methods: We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews of patients to assess their understandings of PRI and their beliefs about its relevance to disease prevention. Results: We completed interviews with 19 participants. Participants described enthusiasm for the generation of PRI and recognized its utility for disease prevention. Participants also described the value of PRI as limited if not corroborated by non-genetic risk factors. Finally, participants noted that PRI, by itself, would be insufficient as a trigger for initiating many preventive interventions. Conclusion: PRI has the potential to become an important tool in primary care. However, patient views about PRI as well as the complexities of disease prevention in the primary care context may limit the impact of PRI on disease prevention. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics 
690 |a R858-859.7 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, Vol 14 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319231151766 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2150-1327 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/c63b50e0f44e4f0aa6982c5e1e33d3dd  |z Connect to this object online.