Balanced discussion of second-generation antihistamines' data
Rossen Boev,1 Jürgen WG Bentz2 1UCB Pharma, Bulle, Switzerland; 2UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium It is with interest that we read the paper “Treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria: a review of the newest antihistamine drug bilastine” by Wang et al1, in which...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Dove Medical Press,
2016-11-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Rossen Boev,1 Jürgen WG Bentz2 1UCB Pharma, Bulle, Switzerland; 2UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium It is with interest that we read the paper “Treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria: a review of the newest antihistamine drug bilastine” by Wang et al1, in which the authors provide insights into the burden of allergic diseases in the Asia-Pacific region. Unfortunately, we found that the review provides some unsubstantiated information, incorrect statements, and/or data inconsistencies as listed below.The abstract states that bilastine “has very low potential for drug–drug interactions”; however, the drug label lists interactions with ketoconazole, erythromycin, diltiazem, and other intestinal efflux transporters, leading to 2–3-fold increases in drug maximum serum concentration and area under the curve2. Also, food interactions decrease bilastine’s bioavailability by 30%, and the label recommendation is that it is taken 1 hour before or 2 hours after intake of food or fruit juice2. View the original article by Wang et al. |
---|---|
Item Description: | 1178-203X |