Biologics for severe, chronic plaque psoriasis: An Australian cost-utility analysisCapsule Summary

Background: Biologics are a good therapeutic option for severe, chronic plaque psoriasis; however, they come with significant cost to the health care system. Objective: To conduct a cost-utility analysis of outpatient biologics (adalimumab, etanercept, guselkumab, ixekizumab, risankizumab, secukinum...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helen Y. Sun, BSc (Med) (Author), Elena Keller, MHEcon (Author), Harish Suresh, BAct (Co-op) (Author), Deshan F. Sebaratnam, FACD (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2021-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_c6d6aad5b0b9407a863ed31d8beb91c8
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Helen Y. Sun, BSc  |q  (Med)   |e author 
700 1 0 |a Elena Keller, MHEcon  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Harish Suresh, BAct  |q  (Co-op)   |e author 
700 1 0 |a Deshan F. Sebaratnam, FACD  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Biologics for severe, chronic plaque psoriasis: An Australian cost-utility analysisCapsule Summary 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2021-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2666-3287 
500 |a 10.1016/j.jdin.2021.06.004 
520 |a Background: Biologics are a good therapeutic option for severe, chronic plaque psoriasis; however, they come with significant cost to the health care system. Objective: To conduct a cost-utility analysis of outpatient biologics (adalimumab, etanercept, guselkumab, ixekizumab, risankizumab, secukinumab, tildrakizumab, and ustekinumab) available to adults with severe, chronic plaque psoriasis from the perspective of the Australian health care system. Methods: A Markov cohort model was constructed to estimate the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs accrued for treatment pathways commencing with different first-line biologics, over a 96-week time horizon. The model adhered to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme eligibility criteria and guidelines. Results: A biologic treatment pathway commencing on tildrakizumab was the most cost-effective first-line treatment (Australian dollar 39,930; total utility of 1.57 QALYs over 96 weeks). First-line secukinumab and risankizumab had incremental cost-utility ratios of Australian dollar 194,524/QALY and Australian dollar 479,834/QALY, respectively, when compared with first-line tildrakizumab. Limitations: The efficacy and utility input parameters were derived from international randomized control trials and patients from the United Kingdom, respectively. Findings from this study cannot be generalized beyond Australia. Conclusion: Tildrakizumab may be considered as first-line treatment for adult patients with severe, chronic plaque psoriasis embarking on biologic therapy, from the economic perspective of the Australian health care system. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a adalimumab 
690 |a Australia 
690 |a biologic therapy 
690 |a cost-effectiveness analysis 
690 |a cost-utility analysis 
690 |a cost-benefit analysis 
690 |a Dermatology 
690 |a RL1-803 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n JAAD International, Vol 5, Iss , Pp 1-8 (2021) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666328721000456 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2666-3287 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/c6d6aad5b0b9407a863ed31d8beb91c8  |z Connect to this object online.