Cannabinoid Use for Pain Reduction in Spinal Cord Injuries: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) often involves multimodal pain control. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cannabinoid use for the reduction of pain in SCI patients.Methods and Findings: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analys...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sung Huang Laurent Tsai (Author), Chun-Ru Lin (Author), Shih-Chieh Shao (Author), Chao-Hua Fang (Author), Tsai-Sheng Fu (Author), Tung-Yi Lin (Author), Yu-Chiang Hung (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2022-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_c6fcda7e8a7d4ea5aceed942cd41ca2d
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Sung Huang Laurent Tsai  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Chun-Ru Lin  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Shih-Chieh Shao  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Chao-Hua Fang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Tsai-Sheng Fu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Tung-Yi Lin  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yu-Chiang Hung  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Cannabinoid Use for Pain Reduction in Spinal Cord Injuries: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2022-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1663-9812 
500 |a 10.3389/fphar.2022.866235 
520 |a Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) often involves multimodal pain control. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cannabinoid use for the reduction of pain in SCI patients.Methods and Findings: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the efficacy (e.g., pain relief) or safety (e.g., adverse events) of cannabinoids in patients with SCI, from inception to 25 December 2021. The study quality and the quality of evidence were evaluated by Cochrane ROB 2.0 and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations system (GRADE), respectively. We used the random-effects model to perform the meta-analysis. From a total of 9,500 records, we included five RCTs with 417 SCI patients in the systematic review and meta-analysis. We judged all five of the included RCTs as being at high risk of bias. This meta-analysis indicated no significant difference in pain relief between the cannabinoids and placebo in SCI patients (mean difference of mean differences of pain scores: −5.68; 95% CI: −13.09, 1.73; p = 0.13; quality of evidence: very low), but higher odds of adverse events were found in SCI patients receiving cannabinoids (odds ratio: 3.76; 95% CI: 1.98, 7.13; p < 0.0001; quality of evidence: moderate).Conclusion: The current best evidence suggests that cannabinoids may not be beneficial for pain relief in SCI patients, but they do increase the risks of adverse events, including dizziness, somnolence, and dysgeusia, compared to the placebo. Cannabinoids should not be regularly suggested for pain reduction in SCI patients. Updating the systematic reviews and meta-analyses by integrating future RCTs is necessary to confirm these findings. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a cannabinoids 
690 |a spinal cord injury 
690 |a trauma 
690 |a spine 
690 |a pain 
690 |a adverse events 
690 |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology 
690 |a RM1-950 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontiers in Pharmacology, Vol 13 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2022.866235/full 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1663-9812 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/c6fcda7e8a7d4ea5aceed942cd41ca2d  |z Connect to this object online.