Chalk Talks for the Clinical Setting: Evaluation of a Medical Education Workshop for Fellows

Introduction Chalk talks are effective teaching tools in the clinical setting. However, data on optimal strategies for teaching medical educators how to develop and deliver them are limited. We designed and implemented two 50-minute workshops to help subspecialty fellows across GME create and delive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shady I. Soliman (Author), William McGuire (Author), Tricia Santos (Author), Charlie Goldberg (Author), Charles Coffey (Author), Darcy Wooten (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Association of American Medical Colleges, 2024-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_c7e67c33e23a48eaa6614d897134e750
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Shady I. Soliman  |e author 
700 1 0 |a William McGuire  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Tricia Santos  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Charlie Goldberg  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Charles Coffey  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Darcy Wooten  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Chalk Talks for the Clinical Setting: Evaluation of a Medical Education Workshop for Fellows 
260 |b Association of American Medical Colleges,   |c 2024-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11385 
500 |a 2374-8265 
520 |a Introduction Chalk talks are effective teaching tools in the clinical setting. However, data on optimal strategies for teaching medical educators how to develop and deliver them are limited. We designed and implemented two 50-minute workshops to help subspecialty fellows across GME create and deliver a chalk talk. Methods The first workshop comprised a demonstration of an effective chalk talk and a discussion of best practices for creating chalk talks; the second was a practice session where fellows presented their chalk talks and received feedback from faculty and peers. We evaluated pre- and postworkshop confidence in the ability to create and deliver a chalk talk and develop learning objectives. Secondary outcomes were faculty and peer evaluations of the chalk talks. Results Eighteen of 33 participants (54% response rate) completed both pre- and postsession surveys. Fellows reported improved confidence in their ability to create a chalk talk (22% vs. 83%, p < .001), deliver a chalk talk (17% vs. 83%, p < .001), and develop well-written learning objectives (11% vs. 83%, p < .001). After the workshop, participants were more likely to correctly identify a chalk talk that made use of an advanced organizer (67% vs. 89%, p < .05). Thirty-eight faculty and peers completed feedback evaluations of participants' chalk talks; most rated fellows' chalk talks highly in domains of content, delivery, design, learning objectives, and engagement. Discussion The incorporation of these workshop within a course on medical education can effectively develop clinical teaching skills among subspecialty fellows in GME. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Chalk Talks 
690 |a Learning Objectives 
690 |a Clinical Teaching/Bedside Teaching 
690 |a Multimedia 
690 |a Medicine (General) 
690 |a R5-920 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n MedEdPORTAL, Vol 20 (2024) 
787 0 |n http://www.mededportal.org/doi/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11385 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2374-8265 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/c7e67c33e23a48eaa6614d897134e750  |z Connect to this object online.