Clinical utility of Cone Beam Computed Tomography to define treatment in cases of medium and high endodontic complexity.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in cases of medium and high endodontic complexity. The relevance of CBCT to define treatment was evaluated through the Wittenberg questionnaire and the variation in treatment plans after CBCT exam anal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Germán Buchheister (Author), Patricio Meléndez (Author), Alejandro Herrera (Author), Kevin Lever (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Universidad de Concepción., 2019-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_c7f2b1459e2a4c62a7133f738a5df812
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Germán Buchheister  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Patricio Meléndez  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Alejandro Herrera  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kevin Lever  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Clinical utility of Cone Beam Computed Tomography to define treatment in cases of medium and high endodontic complexity. 
260 |b Universidad de Concepción.,   |c 2019-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.17126/joralres.2019.066 
500 |a 0719-2460 
500 |a 0719-2479 
520 |a The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in cases of medium and high endodontic complexity. The relevance of CBCT to define treatment was evaluated through the Wittenberg questionnaire and the variation in treatment plans after CBCT exam analysis. The sample (n=40) was chosen for convenience over a period of 4 months. It considered the current recommendations to request CBCT exams before performing root canal treatments. Data collection was carried out through a survey applied to the treating clinicians, after examining the information obtained by the CBCT system. Data were analyzed with the Stata version 13 software, and the Chi-square test was used for inferential analysis. A 95% confidence interval was considered. The most frequent dental groups corresponded to upper posterior and upper anterior teeth (47.5% and 30.0%); the cases were equally distributed according to complexity (50% and 50%). The main reason for requesting CBCT exams corresponded to complex anatomy and/or atypical canal system (37.5%). The use of CBCT increased confidence in the initial treatment chosen by clinicians in 50% of cases according to the Wittenberg questionnaire, and a 45% variation in treatment plans was observed. There was no statistical relationship between complexity and the variables studied. CBCT contributed greatly to the therapeutic management of cases regardless of their complexity. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a cone-beam computed tomography 
690 |a endodontics 
690 |a decision making 
690 |a root canal therapy 
690 |a surveys and questionnaires 
690 |a tooth root 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Oral Research, Vol 8, Iss 6, Pp 455-462 (2019) 
787 0 |n http://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/joralres.2019.066/637 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0719-2460 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0719-2479 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/c7f2b1459e2a4c62a7133f738a5df812  |z Connect to this object online.