Does cabergoline administration affect endometrial VEGFR-2 expression in a rat model of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome?

Objective To assess the effect of cabergoline on endometrial vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) immunoexpression in an ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rat model.Material and Methods Twenty-one immature female Wistar rats were assigned into three groups: group 1, the con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nafiye Yilmaz (Author), Pinar Gulsen Coban (Author), Saynur Yilmaz (Author), Hasan Ali Inal (Author), Hakan Timur (Author), Hacer Haltas (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Taylor & Francis Group, 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_c87d09c587a74bd2bd20c1de86da78f4
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Nafiye Yilmaz  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Pinar Gulsen Coban  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Saynur Yilmaz  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hasan Ali Inal  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hakan Timur  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hacer Haltas  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Does cabergoline administration affect endometrial VEGFR-2 expression in a rat model of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome? 
260 |b Taylor & Francis Group,   |c 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1080/09513590.2023.2217295 
500 |a 1473-0766 
500 |a 0951-3590 
520 |a Objective To assess the effect of cabergoline on endometrial vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) immunoexpression in an ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rat model.Material and Methods Twenty-one immature female Wistar rats were assigned into three groups: group 1, the control group; group 2, stimulated with gonadotropins to mimic OHSS; and group 3, in which an OHSS protocol was induced and thereafter treated with cabergoline (100 μg/kg/day). Body weight, ovarian volume, corpora lutea numbers, and endometrial VEGFR-2 expression were compared between the groups.Results Weight gain and ovarian volume were highest in the OHSS-placebo group, while cabergoline administration significantly reversed those effects (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). VEGFR-2 stained cells were significantly lower in groups 2 and 3 compared to group 1 (p = 0.002). Although VEGFR-2 expression was lowest in group 3, the difference was not statistically significant. Corpora lutea numbers were also similar (p = 0.465).Conclusion While successful implantation requires a vascularized receptive endometrium, impaired expression of VEGFR-2 and disrupted endometrial angiogenesis due to cabergoline administration may be associated with IVF failure in fresh OHSS cycles. The insignificant decrease in endometrial VEGFR-2 expression observed in this research needs to be investigated by further studies involving additional techniques such as immunoblotting and/or RT-PCR analyses. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Cabergoline 
690 |a implantation 
690 |a ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome 
690 |a rat model 
690 |a VEGFR-2 
690 |a Gynecology and obstetrics 
690 |a RG1-991 
690 |a Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology 
690 |a RC648-665 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Gynecological Endocrinology, Vol 39, Iss 1 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/09513590.2023.2217295 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0951-3590 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1473-0766 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/c87d09c587a74bd2bd20c1de86da78f4  |z Connect to this object online.