Exploring Acceptability, Barriers, and Facilitators for Digital Health in Dermatology: Qualitative Focus Groups With Dermatologists, Nurses, and Patients

BackgroundAlthough several digital health interventions (DHIs) have shown promise in the care of skin diseases their uptake in Germany has been limited. To fully understand the reasons for the low uptake, an in-depth analysis of patients' and health care providers' barriers and facilitator...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patrick Reinders (Author), Matthias Augustin (Author), Anastasia Fleyder (Author), Marina Otten (Author)
Format: Book
Published: JMIR Publications, 2024-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_c8d70bdac14f48e4bbb8c74c9a04f1e5
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Patrick Reinders  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Matthias Augustin  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Anastasia Fleyder  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Marina Otten  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Exploring Acceptability, Barriers, and Facilitators for Digital Health in Dermatology: Qualitative Focus Groups With Dermatologists, Nurses, and Patients 
260 |b JMIR Publications,   |c 2024-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2562-0959 
500 |a 10.2196/57172 
520 |a BackgroundAlthough several digital health interventions (DHIs) have shown promise in the care of skin diseases their uptake in Germany has been limited. To fully understand the reasons for the low uptake, an in-depth analysis of patients' and health care providers' barriers and facilitators in dermatology is needed. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to explore and compare attitudes, acceptability, barriers, and facilitators of patients, dermatologists, and nurses toward DHIs in dermatology. MethodsWe conducted 6 web-based focus groups each with patients (n=34), dermatologists (n=30), and nurses (n=30) using a semistructured interview guide with short descriptions of DHIs described in the literature. A content analysis was performed using deductive constructs, following the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology framework, and inductive categories. ResultsPatients identified many positive performance expectancies, such as reduced travel times and improvement in follow-up appointments. Dermatologists also stated positive effects (eg, promotion of standardized care), but also negative implications of health care digitalization (eg, increased workload). All stakeholders reported that a DHI should bring additional value to all stakeholders. A lack of digital competence among patients was identified as the major barrier to adoption by all 3 groups. Nurses and dermatologists want apps that are easy to use and easy to implement into their daily routines. Trust in selected institutions, colleagues, and physicians was identified as a facilitator. Patients reported their dependence on the dermatologists' acceptance. All groups expressed concerns about data privacy risks and dermatologists stated insecurities toward data privacy laws. ConclusionsTo ensure successful digitalization in dermatology, apps should be user-friendly, adapted to users' skill levels, and beneficial for all stakeholders. The incorporation of dermatologists' perspectives is especially important as their acceptance may impact use among patients and nurses. DHIs should ensure and be transparent about data privacy. The found barriers and facilitators can be used for implementation strategies. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Dermatology 
690 |a RL1-803 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n JMIR Dermatology, Vol 7, p e57172 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://derma.jmir.org/2024/1/e57172 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2562-0959 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/c8d70bdac14f48e4bbb8c74c9a04f1e5  |z Connect to this object online.