Women's perspectives on resilience and research on resilience in motherhood: A qualitative study

Abstract Purpose Definitional perspectives and operational approaches to the concept of resilience vary within the literature; however, little is known of women's opinions on current resilience research, or the philosophical and methodological directions women believe such research should take....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Susan Hannon (Author), Agnes Higgins (Author), Déirdre Daly (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wiley, 2023-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_c90b49e142c840cd938a7893f8c20bb4
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Susan Hannon  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Agnes Higgins  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Déirdre Daly  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Women's perspectives on resilience and research on resilience in motherhood: A qualitative study 
260 |b Wiley,   |c 2023-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1369-7625 
500 |a 1369-6513 
500 |a 10.1111/hex.13762 
520 |a Abstract Purpose Definitional perspectives and operational approaches to the concept of resilience vary within the literature; however, little is known of women's opinions on current resilience research, or the philosophical and methodological directions women believe such research should take. This research explored women's perspectives on resilience research in the perinatal period and early motherhood and sought their opinions on the ways in which they believe research should be advanced. Methods Following ethical approval, online interviews were conducted with 14 ethnically and socioeconomically diverse women who were mothers. Findings from a concept analysis on resilience in pregnancy and early motherhood, conducted by the authors, were shared with women before and during the interview. Interviews were organised in sections corresponding to the findings within the concept analysis' four philosophical (Epistemology, Linguistic, Logic, Pragmatic) principles and thematically analysed. Results Epistemology-Women endorsed a dynamic process definition, and viewed resilience as influenced by multilevel, multisystemic processes. Linguistic-Women viewed words such as 'adaptation' and 'adjustment' as being more active and empowering than the term 'coping' in relation to motherhood. Logic-Women were resistant to the predominant operational conceptualisation of resilience as illness absence. Pragmatic-Women were wary of resilience research being used to reduce mental health support for other mothers and families. Conclusions Women provided constructive criticisms on the current state of resilience literature. Women suggested actionable ways in which research may be developed to better align with the epistemological and ethical approaches women want to see in resilience and maternal mental health research. Patient or Public Contribution Women who are mothers and participants in health research were consulted on their views of trends in mental health and resilience research in motherhood. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a mental health 
690 |a motherhood 
690 |a perinatal 
690 |a postpartum 
690 |a resilience 
690 |a women's perspectives 
690 |a Medicine (General) 
690 |a R5-920 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Health Expectations, Vol 26, Iss 4, Pp 1575-1583 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13762 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1369-6513 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1369-7625 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/c90b49e142c840cd938a7893f8c20bb4  |z Connect to this object online.