Peripilar Sign in Androgenetic Alopecia: Does It Really Indicate Peripilar Infiltrate?

Introduction: Peripilar sign (PPS) is a trichoscopic sign that was first described in androgenetic alopecia (AGA) and is thought to reflect the presence of perifollicular infiltrate (PFI) in histopathology. Objectives: To study PPS in a cohort of patients with AGA and to assess its validity as a sig...

Szczegółowa specyfikacja

Zapisane w:
Opis bibliograficzny
Główni autorzy: Dina Abdalla (Autor), Manal Bosseila (Autor), Mona R.E. Abdel-Halim (Autor), Iman Sany (Autor)
Format: Książka
Wydane: Mattioli1885, 2024-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Hasła przedmiotowe:
Dostęp online:Connect to this object online.
Etykiety: Dodaj etykietę
Nie ma etykietki, Dołącz pierwszą etykiete!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_c90e85090d3b4fc1bae287d6eb6bcf63
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Dina Abdalla   |e author 
700 1 0 |a Manal Bosseila  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mona R.E. Abdel-Halim  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Iman Sany  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Peripilar Sign in Androgenetic Alopecia: Does It Really Indicate Peripilar Infiltrate? 
260 |b Mattioli1885,   |c 2024-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.5826/dpc.1401a96 
500 |a 2160-9381 
520 |a Introduction: Peripilar sign (PPS) is a trichoscopic sign that was first described in androgenetic alopecia (AGA) and is thought to reflect the presence of perifollicular infiltrate (PFI) in histopathology. Objectives: To study PPS in a cohort of patients with AGA and to assess its validity as a sign indicative of PFI. Methods: One hundred patients with AGA (confirmed by trichoscopic examination) were recruited in this cross-sectional study. From those patients, frontal scalp biopsy was done for two subgroups, 22 patients with PPS and 23 patients without PPS. Both groups were compared as regards the presence of PFI. Results: Peripilar sign was present in 50% of the 100 studied cases. No significant difference existed between those with and those without PPS as regards PFI. Peripilar sign was significantly more encountered in patients with skin type III (p=0.001). Its absence was significantly associated with lower interpretability of yellow dots (p<0.001) and their scores were significantly positively correlated (r=0.498, p<0.001). Peripilar sign was significantly associated with absent melanophages histopathologically (p=0.011). Conclusion: Peripilar sign as a trichoscopic sign in AGA does not reflect PFI. It represents a dark color more encountered in patients with lighter skin types. This can be explained by the increased contrast between the dark PPS and the lighter surrounding skin in lighter skin types. Further studies using melanocyte markers and Masson Fontana's stain are needed to further verify the cause of this peri-follicular dark color. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a androgenetic alopecia 
690 |a trichoscopy 
690 |a histopathology 
690 |a peripilar sign 
690 |a perifollicular infiltrate 
690 |a Dermatology 
690 |a RL1-803 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Dermatology Practical & Conceptual, Vol 14, Iss 1 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://dpcj.org/index.php/dpc/article/view/2966 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2160-9381 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/c90e85090d3b4fc1bae287d6eb6bcf63  |z Connect to this object online.